State of Conservation (SOC)

• Garamba National Park (1985)
  Democratic Republic of the Congo
  Year: 1985
  Threats*: Illegal activities,
  Danger List: Yes
  Document Source: SC.85/CONF.008/09
  

• Garamba National Park (1984)
  Democratic Republic of the Congo
  Year: 1984
  Threats*: Illegal activities,
  Document Source: SC.84/CONF.001/04,SC.84/CONF.004/04
  

• Göreme National Park and the Rock Sites of Cappadocia (1992)
  Turkey
  Year: 1992
  Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure,
  Document Source: CLT.92/CONF.003/02,WHC.92/CONF.002/12
  

• Göreme National Park and the Rock Sites of Cappadocia (1988)
  Turkey
  Year: 1988
  Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure,
  Document Source: SC.88/CONF.001/13
  

• Great Barrier Reef (1994)
  Australia
  Year: 1994
  Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, Ground transport infrastructure, Mining,
  Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/16
  

• Great Barrier Reef (1986)
  Australia
  Year: 1986
  Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, Ground transport infrastructure, Mining,
  Document Source: CC.86/CONF.003/INF.4,CC.86/CONF.001/11
  

• Great Barrier Reef (1985)
  Australia
  Year: 1985
  Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure,
  Document Source: SC.85/CONF.008/09
  

• Hal Saflieni Hypogeum (1994)
  Malta
  Year: 1994
  Threats*: Solid waste, Relative humidity, Temperature, Radiation/light, Water, Micro-organisms, Management activities,
  Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/06
  

• Hal Saflieni Hypogeum (1990)
  Malta
  Year: 1990
  Threats*: Solid waste, Relative humidity, Temperature, Radiation/light, Water, Micro-organisms, Management activities,
  Document Source: CC.90/CONF.004/03
  

• Hanseatic City of Lübeck (1993)
  Germany
  Year: 1993
  Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage,
  Other Threats: Discovery of mural paintings - need for restoration
  Document Source: WHC.93/CONF.002/05
  

• Hawaii Volcanoes National Park (1990)
  United States of America
  Year: 1990
  Threats*: Management systems/ management plan,
  Document Source: CC.90/CONF.004/13
  

• Hierapolis-Pamukkale (1991)
  Turkey
  Year: 1991
  Threats*: Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation, Management systems/ management plan,
  Document Source: SC.91/CONF.002/04
  

• Hierapolis-Pamukkale (1990)
  Turkey
  Year: 1990
  Threats*: Management systems/ management plan,
  Document Source: CC.90/CONF.004/13
  

• Historic Areas of Istanbul (1994)
  Turkey
  Year: 1994
  Threats*: Management systems/ management plan, Management activities,
  Other Threats: Need to monitor movements which could affect the structure of the building
  Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/06 Add,WHC.94/CONF.003/06
  

• Historic Areas of Istanbul (1993)
  Turkey
  Year: 1993
  Threats*: Management systems/ management plan,
  Other Threats: Need to monitor movements which could affect the structure of the building
  Document Source: WHC.93/CONF.001/03,WHC.93/CONF.002/05
  

• Historic Areas of Istanbul (1992)
  Turkey
  Year: 1992
  Threats*: Management systems/ management plan,
  Document Source: WHC.92/CONF.002/05
  

• Historic Centre of Florence (1994)
  Italy
  Year: 1994
  Threats*: Terrorism,
  Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/16
  

• Historic Centre of Lima (1994)
  Peru
  Year: 1994
  Threats*: Management systems/ management plan,
  Other Threats: Need to improve the environment of the convent; Notorious state of degradation
  Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/16
  

• Historic Centre of Lima (1993)
  Peru
  Year: 1993
  Threats*: Management activities,
  Other Threats: Need to improve the environment of the convent
  Document Source: WHC.93/CONF.002/14
  

• Historic Centre of Puebla (1994)
  Mexico
  Year: 1994
  Threats*: Housing, Commercial development, Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, Deliberate destruction of heritage,
  Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.001/03B Add.2,WHC.94/CONF.003/06 Add,WHC.94/CONF.003/06
  

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.