English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
74
Reports
17
Properties
1
States Parties
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2006
Document Source:  WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Water infrastructure
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Water infrastructure
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2003
Document Source:  WHC.03/27.COM/07B
Threats*: Water infrastructure
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2001
Document Source:  WHC.01/CONF.205/05,WHC.01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Water infrastructure
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  1993
Document Source:  WHC.93/CONF.001/03,WHC.93/CONF.002/05
Threats*: Housing Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2011
Document Source:  WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Housing Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2013
Document Source:  WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2011
Document Source:  WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2010
Document Source:  WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2009
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2008
Document Source:  WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.