Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

10
Reports
10
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2011close
Date end:2011close
Threats* : Erosion and siltation/ depositionclose
States Parties: Niger
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7A
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: poverty
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
States Parties: Panama
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: a) Deterioration and destruction of the fabric of the property by environmental factors
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: b) Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb;
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7A
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add.2
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: risk of collapse of historic building
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
States Parties: Morocco
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: Partial abandonment of the property
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7A
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: Deterioration of the architectural heritage fabric
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top