English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
11
Reports
11
Properties
11
States Parties
States Parties:  Pakistan
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: a) Lack of capacity in conservation techniques; b) Lack of monitoring system
States Parties:  Romania
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Deterioration of the monuments in general and the fortification in particular
States Parties:  Peru
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
States Parties:  Kenya
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: a) Fire; b) Lack of law enforcement
States Parties:  Indonesia
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
States Parties:  India
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Destruction to park infrastructure
States Parties:  Australia
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
States Parties:  Philippines
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Financial resources
States Parties:  South Africa
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: a) Difficulties with operational aspects of maintenance and conservation implementation ; b) Lack of appropriate conservation of the built heritage; c) Lack of integration of natural values in management of site
States Parties:  Bangladesh
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Lack of monitoring system
States Parties:  Uganda
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: a) Anti-personnel mines infestation in the park; b) Degradation of lands around the park


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.