English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
14
Reports
14
Properties
12
States Parties
States Parties:  Romania
Year:  2000
Document Source:  WHC.00/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Mining
States Parties:  Cameroon
Year:  2000
Document Source:  WHC.00/CONF.202/05,WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC.00/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Mining
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2000
Document Source:  WHC.00/CONF.202/05,WHC.00/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Mining
States Parties:  Australia
Year:  2000
Document Source:  WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC.00/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Mining
Other Threats: Need for more effective catchment management in lands adjacent to the Park
States Parties:  Hungary
Year:  2000
Document Source:  WHC.00/CONF.202/05,WHC.00/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Mining
States Parties:  Peru
Year:  2000
Document Source:  WHC.00/CONF.202/05,WHC.00/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Mining
States Parties:  Australia
Year:  2000
Document Source:  WHC.00/CONF.202/05,WHC.00/CONF.202/INF.06,WHC-00/CONF.203/INF.4,WHC-00/CONF.203/INF.5 ,WHC.00/CONF.204/10,WHC-2000/CONF.202/INF.6
Threats*: Mining
States Parties:  Indonesia
Year:  2000
Document Source:  WHC.00/CONF.202/05,WHC.00/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Mining
States Parties:  Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea
Year:  2000
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC.00/CONF.202/04,WHC.00/CONF.204/09
Threats*: Mining
States Parties:  Senegal
Year:  2000
Document Source:  WHC.00/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Mining
States Parties:  Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year:  2000
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC.00/CONF.202/04,WHC.00/CONF.204/09
Threats*: Mining
States Parties:  Australia
Year:  2000
Document Source:  WHC.00/CONF.202/05,WHC-00/CONF.202/INF.11,WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC.00/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Mining
States Parties:  Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year:  2000
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC.00/CONF.202/04,WHC.00/CONF.204/09
Threats*: Mining
States Parties:  Russian Federation
Year:  2000
Document Source:  WHC.00/CONF.202/05,WHC.00/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Mining


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.