State of Conservation
11
Reports
11
Properties
11
States Parties
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1994 |
Danger List: | Yes |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/06 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/06 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.001/03B Add.1 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1994 |
Danger List: | Yes |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.001/03B,WHC.94/CONF.001/03B Add.1,WHC.94/CONF.003/06 Add,WHC.94/CONF.003/06 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Destruction of Park infrastructures |
States Parties: |
![]() ![]() |
Year: | 1994 |
Danger List: | Yes |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/06 Add,WHC.94/CONF.003/06 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1994 |
Danger List: | Yes |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/06 Add,WHC.94/CONF.003/06 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.001/03B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Cracks in the surface of the vaults |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1994 |
Danger List: | Yes |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.001/03B Add.1,WHC.94/CONF.003/06 Add,WHC.94/CONF.003/06 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Fire |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/06 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Properties
Categories
Regions
States Parties
Brazil Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Democratic Republic of the Congo Ecuador Guinea India Jordan Niger United Republic of Tanzania ZimbabweThreats
Illegal activities (11)* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.