Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

397
Reports
106
Properties concerned
58
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2010close
Threats* : Ground transport infrastructureclose
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/3
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Yemen
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Deteriorated state of some of the monuments
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Spain
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Cybernetic fountain; Panaromic lifts to serve the inscribed part from other quarters of the town
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1987
Document Source: SC-87/CONF.005/INF.1
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Fires
States Parties: Chile
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, and stucco and lightweight construction that functioned with regular maintenance; Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years ; Metal cladding corroded and some of the structural elements dismantled. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is given ; Very little conservation work carried ou
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Chile
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: a) Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, and stucco and lightweight construction that functioned with regular maintenanceb) Lack of maintenance for 40 years c) Metal cladding corroded and some of the structural elements dismantled. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is givend) Very little conservation work carried out
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top