jump to the content

State of Conservation (SOC)

Results

176 SOC reports
178 Property(ies)
91 States Parties
Date Start: 2009
Date end: 2009

By Year
Properties by Region
Properties by Category
 Previous page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  ...  9  See All
  • Historic Centre of Lima (2009)
    Peru
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B

  • Historic Centre of Macao (2009)
    China
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Housing,
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B

  • Historic Centre of Mexico City and Xochimilco (2009)
    Mexico
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage, Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B

  • Historic Centre of Naples (2009)
    Italy
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Management systems/ management plan,
    Other Threats: lack of continuous maintenance of the urban fabric
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B

  • Historic Centre of Prague (2009)
    Czech Republic
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Housing, Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B

  • Historic Centre of Riga (2009)
    Latvia
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Housing, Legal framework,
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B

  • Historic Centre of Saint Petersburg and Related Groups of Monuments (2009)
    Russian Federation
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Housing, Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add

  • Historic Centre of the City of Salzburg (2009)
    Austria
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Housing, Ground transport infrastructure,
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B

  • Historic Centre of Vienna (2009)
    Austria
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Housing, Ground transport infrastructure,
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B

  • Historic Centres of Berat and Gjirokastra  (2009)
    Albania
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Housing, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan,
    Other Threats: a) Fire; b) Lack of specific monitoring indicator; c) Lack of adequate firefighting arrangements in the historic urban zone; d) Lack of a programme of archaeological excavation
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B

  • Historic Ensemble of the Potala Palace, Lhasa (2009)
    China
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Housing, Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, Interpretative and visitation facilities, Management activities,
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B

  • Historic Monuments of Ancient Nara (2009)
    Japan
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure, Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation,
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B

  • Historic Quarter of the City of Colonia del Sacramento (2009)
    Uruguay
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Commercial development, Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, Marine transport infrastructure, Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B

  • Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu (2009)
    Peru
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation, Avalanche/ landslide, Governance, Management systems/ management plan, Financial resources,
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add

  • Historic Town of Zabid (2009)
    Yemen
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Housing, Land conversion, Illegal activities, Deliberate destruction of heritage, Management systems/ management plan,
    Danger List: Yes
    Other Threats: a) Serious degradation of the city’s heritage (many houses and the ancient souq are in an alarming deterioration state);
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A

  • Historical Centre of the City of Arequipa (2009)
    Peru
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Deliberate destruction of heritage, Flooding, Earthquake,
    Other Threats: Material decay and abandonment of buildings, as well as the effect of heavy traffic on historic buildings
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B,

  • Historical Centre of the City of Yaroslavl (2009)
    Russian Federation
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Housing, Management activities,
    Other Threats: Changes in the built fabric
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add

  • Historical Monuments at Makli, Thatta (2009)
    Pakistan
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition, Management systems/ management plan,
    Other Threats: a) Significant decay of the property caused by local climatic conditions and alluvial erosionb) Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tombd) Lack of monitoring
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B

  • Historical Monuments of Mtskheta (2009)
    Georgia
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Land conversion, Erosion and siltation/ deposition, Management systems/ management plan, Management activities,
    Other Threats: f) Loss of authenticity
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B

  • Humberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Works (2009)
    Chile
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Wind, Deliberate destruction of heritage, Management systems/ management plan,
    Danger List: Yes
    Other Threats: a) Extremely fragile nature of the industrial buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, in addition to stucco and lightweight constructionb) Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years c) Corrosion of metal cladding and dismantlement of some of the structural elements. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is givend) Very little conservation work carried out
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A

 Previous page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  ...  9  See All


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.