Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

58
Reports
36
Properties concerned
27
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2006close
Threats* : Interpretative and visitation facilitiesclose
States Parties: Greece
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of documentation and equipment
States Parties: Cambodia
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance, insufficient guardianship and control system inside and outside the archaeological area
States Parties: Morocco
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Need to preserve the landscape
States Parties: Poland
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Poland
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Poland
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.6,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Poland
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Uncontrolled vendors within and around the property
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Albania
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: a) Lack of adequate protection and conservation of the site; b) Serious deterioration of materials resulting in an important loss of cultural significance
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: China
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Dominican Republic
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Deterioration of structures caused by natural and human hazards
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected areas (mainly the Ottoman period timber houses in the district of Zeyrek and Süleymaniye)
States Parties: Paraguay
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Argentina Brazil
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Malta
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: China
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Mali
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Cyprus
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: China
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance ; Industrial pollution
States Parties: China
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance ; Halt of site excavations
States Parties: China
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance ; Halt of site excavations
States Parties: China
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance ; Halt of site excavations
States Parties: China
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Unstable archaeological strata and cave roof
States Parties: Jordan
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: South Africa
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: a) Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities; b) Fire
States Parties: South Africa
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities
States Parties: Italy
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Italy
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Slovenia
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Risks of collapse
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Risks of collapse
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Risks of collapse
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Risks of collapse
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: China
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Mali
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of capacities in conservation techniques
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jordan
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of security and risk of collapse due to open trenches and unstable structures
States Parties: Lao People's Democratic Republic
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Lao People's Democratic Republic
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/INF.6,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top