Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

11
Reports
5
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2003mode=listclose
Date end:2003close
Threats* : Society''s valuing of heritageclose
States Parties: India
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.204/2B
Threats*: Society's valuing of heritage
States Parties: Morocco
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Society's valuing of heritage
Other Threats: Site in a state of quasi-total abandon and greatly degraded
States Parties: Morocco
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Society's valuing of heritage
Other Threats: This site has progressively become degraded
States Parties: Morocco
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Society's valuing of heritage
Other Threats: This site has progressively become degraded
States Parties: Morocco
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Society's valuing of heritage
Other Threats: This site has progressively become abandoned and has degraded
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Society's valuing of heritage
States Parties: Mali
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Society's valuing of heritage
Other Threats: Lack of capacities in conservation techniques
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: New Zealand
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Society's valuing of heritage
States Parties: New Zealand
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Society's valuing of heritage
States Parties: New Zealand
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5
Threats*: Society's valuing of heritage
States Parties: New Zealand
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Society's valuing of heritage

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top