Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

11
Reports
11
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2007close
Date end:2007close
Threats* : Crop productionclose
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add.2
Threats*: Crop production
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Crop production
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A
Threats*: Crop production
Other Threats: Continuous deterioration of earthen architecture structures and decorated surfaces from lack of conservation and maintenace practices
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Cameroon
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Crop production
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Crop production
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
States Parties: India
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A
Threats*: Crop production
Other Threats: Forced evacuation of Park staff; and Destruction of Park infrastructur
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Crop production
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A
Threats*: Crop production
Other Threats: Declining populations of Walia ibex, Simien fox and other large mammal species
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Crop production

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top