Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

84
Reports
84
Properties concerned
62
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2005close
Date end:2005close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Um er-Rasas (Kastrom Mefa'a) (2005)
States Parties: Jordan
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Lack of security due to open trenches and unstable structures
Volcanoes of Kamchatka (2005)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
W-Arly-Pendjari Complex (2005)
States Parties: Burkina Faso Benin Niger
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Walled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower (2005)
States Parties: Azerbaijan
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Azerbaijan Bangladesh Belarus Benin Brazil Bulgaria Burkina Faso Cameroon China Côte d'Ivoire Egypt Ethiopia France Georgia Greece Guinea Honduras India Indonesia Iraq Italy Jordan Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Lithuania Mali Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Morocco Nepal Niger Oman Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russian Federation Senegal Solomon Islands South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Tunisia Türkiye Turkmenistan Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Viet Nam Yemen Zimbabwe
Threats
Management systems/ management plan 84

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top