State of Conservation (SOC)

• Fortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo (2010)
  Panama
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition Housing Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure Management systems/ management plan
  Other Threats: a) Deterioration and destruction of the fabric of the property by environmental factors, lack of a maintenance programme, as well as polluted water
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
  

• Galápagos Islands (2010)
  Ecuador
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Fishing/collecting aquatic resources Governance Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community Illegal activities Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure Management systems/ management plan
  Danger List: Yes
  Other Threats: Educational reform not implemented.
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add
  

• Garamba National Park (2010)
  Democratic Republic of the Congo
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Civil unrest Human resources Illegal activities Management systems/ management plan War
  Danger List: Yes
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add
  

• Gebel Barkal and the Sites of the Napatan Region (2010)
  Sudan
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Flooding Housing Management systems/ management plan Wind
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
  

• Group of Monuments at Hampi (2010)
  India
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Management systems/ management plan
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
  

• Gunung Mulu National Park (2010)
  Malaysia
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community Water infrastructure
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
  

• Henderson Island (2010)
  United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Invasive/alien terrestrial species
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
  

• Historic Areas of Istanbul (2010)
  Turkey
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Housing Management activities Management systems/ management plan
  Other Threats: a) Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas);
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
  

• Historic Centre of Brugge (2010)
  Belgium
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Housing Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure Renewable energy facilities
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
  

• Historic Centre of Bukhara (2010)
  Uzbekistan
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Air pollution Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure Management activities Management systems/ management plan Solid waste
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
  

• Historic Centre of Lima (2010)
  Peru
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Housing Management activities Management systems/ management plan
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
  

• Historic Centre of Prague (2010)
  Czech Republic
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Housing Management systems/ management plan
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
  

• Historic Centre of Saint Petersburg and Related Groups of Monuments (2010)
  Russian Federation
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Housing Management systems/ management plan
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
  

• Historic Centre of Sighişoara (2010)
  Romania
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Financial resources Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation Management systems/ management plan
  Other Threats: Deterioration of monuments in general and the fortifications in particular;
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
  

• Historic City of Meknes (2010)
  Morocco
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Water (rain/water table)
  Other Threats: The origin of the collapse could be attributed to a combination of different factors such as insufficient dimensions for the foundations, instability of the ground, probable gradual degradation of the land through lack of drainage and/or possible leaks in urban water pipes of the surrounding area of the building, and finally, sudden infiltration of this ground due to very heavy rainfall a few days prior to the accident
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
  

• Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu (2010)
  Peru
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Avalanche/ landslide Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Governance Ground transport infrastructure Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation Management systems/ management plan
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
  

• Historic Town of Zabid (2010)
  Yemen
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage Housing Land conversion Management systems/ management plan
  Danger List: Yes
  Other Threats: a) Serious degradation of the city’s heritage (many houses and the ancient souq are in an alarming deterioration state);
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add
  

• Historical Centre of the City of Arequipa (2010)
  Peru
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage Ground transport infrastructure Housing Management systems/ management plan
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
  

• Historical Monuments of Mtskheta (2010)
  Georgia
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition Land conversion Management activities Management systems/ management plan
  Danger List: Yes
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add
  

• Humberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Works (2010)
  Chile
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage Management systems/ management plan Wind
  Danger List: Yes
  Other Threats: a) Extremely fragile nature of the industrial buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, in addition to stucco and lightweight constructionb) Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years c) Corrosion of metal cladding and dismantlement of some of the structural elements. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is givend) Very little conservation work carried out
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add
  

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.