State of Conservation
6
Reports
6
Properties
4
States Parties
| States Parties: |
Mauritania
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Estonia
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Peru
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Peru
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Lack of systematic monitoring of the site |
| States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
| Year: | 2006 |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A.Add.Rev |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monument |
| States Parties: |
United States of America
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Properties
Categories
Regions
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.

Mauritania
Estonia
Peru
United States of America

