State of Conservation
11
Reports
11
Properties
11
States Parties
Threats* :
| States Parties: |
Afghanistan
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Risk of imminent collapse of the Giant Buddha niches; Irreversible deterioration of the mural paintings |
| States Parties: |
Lithuania Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Sudan
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Mexico
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Need to initiate a process for the recovery of the urban and social fabric of the property |
| States Parties: |
China
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Peru
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Haiti
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Montenegro
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Nigeria
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Lao People's Democratic Republic
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Properties
Categories
Regions
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.

Afghanistan
Lithuania
Russian Federation
Sudan
Mexico
China
Peru
Haiti
Montenegro
Nigeria
Lao People's Democratic Republic

