State of Conservation
Ground transport infrastructure
|
States Parties:
|
Germany
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
States Parties:
|
Viet Nam
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
States Parties:
|
Cameroon
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
States Parties:
|
Pakistan
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
States Parties:
|
Russian Federation
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
States Parties:
|
Australia
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
States Parties:
|
Australia
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
Other Threats:
|
Need for more effective catchment management in lands adjacent to the Park
|
|
States Parties:
|
India
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Danger List:
|
Yes
|
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
States Parties:
|
Viet Nam
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
Other Threats:
|
Risks linked to addressing environmental impacts of individual projects to the neglect of monitoring cumulative impacts of the overall development of Ha Long City and other areas surrounding the World Heritage area
|
|
States Parties:
|
Morocco
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
States Parties:
|
Peru
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
Other Threats:
|
Accident of a crane which damaged one of the most important monuments at Machu Picchu, the Intihuatana or stone sundial
|
|
States Parties:
|
Peru
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
States Parties:
|
Brazil
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Danger List:
|
Yes
|
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
States Parties:
|
China
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
States Parties:
|
Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Danger List:
|
Yes
|
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
States Parties:
|
United Republic of Tanzania
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
States Parties:
|
Senegal
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
States Parties:
|
Jordan
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
Other Threats:
|
Conservation of antiquities
|
|
States Parties:
|
Honduras
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Danger List:
|
Yes
|
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
|
States Parties:
|
Ecuador
|
|
Year: |
2000 |
|
Danger List:
|
Yes
|
|
Document Source:
|
WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9
|
|
Threats*:
|
Ground transport infrastructure
|
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** :
All mission reports are not always available electronically.
