State of Conservation
12
Reports
12
Properties
10
States Parties
Threats* :
| States Parties: |
Greece
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| States Parties: |
Poland
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
| States Parties: |
Luxembourg
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| States Parties: |
United States of America
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
| Threats*: | Housing Industrial areas |
| States Parties: |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
| Threats*: | Commercial development Interpretative and visitation facilities |
| States Parties: |
Germany
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| States Parties: |
Austria
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| States Parties: |
Georgia
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| States Parties: |
Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
| States Parties: |
United States of America
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Industrial areas |
| States Parties: |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
| Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
| Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
| States Parties: |
Azerbaijan
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
Properties
Categories
Regions
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.

Greece
Poland
Luxembourg
United States of America
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Germany
Austria
Georgia
Russian Federation
Azerbaijan

