State of Conservation
14
Reports
4
Properties
1
States Parties
Threats* :
| Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone | peru Peru |
2011 | Management activities, | Yes |
| chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone | peru Peru |
2009 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Continuous deterioration of earthen architecture structures and decorated surfaces from lack of conservation and maintenance practices |
Yes |
| city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco | peru Peru |
1999 | Management activities, | No |
| city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco | peru Peru |
1998 | Management activities, | No |
| historic centre of limaHistoric Centre of Lima | peru Peru |
2019 | Management activities, | No |
| historic centre of limaHistoric Centre of Lima | peru Peru |
2017 | Management activities, | No |
| historic centre of limaHistoric Centre of Lima | peru Peru |
2015 | Management activities, | No |
| historic centre of limaHistoric Centre of Lima | peru Peru |
2013 | Management activities, | No |
| historic centre of limaHistoric Centre of Lima | peru Peru |
2011 | Management activities, | No |
| historic centre of limaHistoric Centre of Lima | peru Peru |
2010 | Management activities, | No |
| historic centre of limaHistoric Centre of Lima | peru Peru |
1993 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Need to improve the environment of the convent |
No |
| historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa | peru Peru |
2008 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Material decay and abandonment of buildings |
No |
| historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa | peru Peru |
2007 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Material decay and abandonment of buildings |
No |
| historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa | peru Peru |
2006 | Management activities, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.

Peru
