English Français
Please note that given the exceptional circumstances related to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, regular mail sent to the World Heritage Centre in Paris cannot be processed on a normal basis for the moment. To avoid any delays in the treatment of statutory and/or general correspondence, please send systematically to the concerned addressee within the World Heritage Centre an electronic copy of all the correspondence you may wish to transmit. Thank you for your understanding.

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
22
Reports
22
Properties
24
States Parties
 1 2  See All
States Parties:  Niger
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Oman
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Mauritania
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Absence of any real ecotourism policy and strategy; b) Poor progress recorded in the improvement of the living conditions of the local populations
States Parties:  Belarus
Poland
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Effect on forest biomes through drainage of agricultural land on the Belarus side and a reservoir on the Polish side; b) Presence of an artificial fence along the international boundary impeding large mammal movement.
States Parties:  Cameroon
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Montenegro
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Solomon Islands
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Disappointment, confusion, suspicion, division and anger within the community
States Parties:  United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Tunisia
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Brazil
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Indonesia
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources Governance Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  India
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Destruction to park infrastructure
States Parties:  Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Viet Nam
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Bulgaria
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Australia
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
States Parties:  Honduras
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Uganda
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: a) Anti-personnel mines infestation in the park; b) Degradation of lands around the park
 1 2  See All

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.