State of Conservation
9
Reports
9
Properties
9
States Parties
Threats* :
| States Parties: |
Belarus Poland
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
| Other Threats: | a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movement |
| States Parties: |
Canada
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
| States Parties: |
South Africa
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
| Other Threats: | Essential management activities such as the removal of invasive alien species and controlled burning cannot be carried out as required |
| States Parties: |
Senegal
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A.Add.Rev |
| Threats*: | Invasive / alien freshwater species |
| Other Threats: | Salinisation of soils |
| States Parties: |
Ecuador
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Invasive / alien freshwater species Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
| States Parties: |
Senegal
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Translocated species |
| Other Threats: | Serious deterioration in the state of conservation with regard to its large mammal fauna |
| States Parties: |
Honduras
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
| States Parties: |
United States of America
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Invasive / alien freshwater species |
Properties
Categories
Regions
States Parties
Belarus Canada Ecuador Honduras India Poland Senegal South Africa United States of America
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.

Belarus
Poland
Canada
South Africa
Senegal
Ecuador
India
Honduras
United States of America

