State of Conservation
7
Reports
7
Properties
4
States Parties
Threats* :
| States Parties: |
Morocco
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Other Threats: | Need to preserve the landscape |
| States Parties: |
Egypt
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
| Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
| Other Threats: | Dilapidated infrastructure; Neglect and lack of maintenance |
| States Parties: |
Yemen
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of the traditional urban fabric |
| States Parties: |
Algeria
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
| Threats*: | Changes in traditional ways of life and knowledge system |
| Other Threats: | a) Lack of maintenance of housing; b) Collapse of houses (three dead and others injured in May 2002) |
| States Parties: |
Morocco
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Other Threats: | Near total abandonment of the site |
| States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
| Year: | 2005 |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A.Add |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Other Threats: | a) Natural risk factors; b) Conservation of archaeological heritage; c) Deterioration of monuments; d) Alteration of the built fabric. |
| States Parties: |
Algeria
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
| Other Threats: | vegetation with roots seriously affecting archaeological remains |
Properties
Categories
Regions
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.

Morocco
Egypt
Yemen
Algeria

