English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
10
Reports
1
Properties
1
States Parties
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2018
Document Source:  WHC/18/42.COM/7B
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2016
Document Source:  WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2014
Document Source:  WHC-14/38.COM/7B
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2012
Document Source:  WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2011
Document Source:  WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Educational reform not implemented.
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2010
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Educational reform not implemented.
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2009
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7A
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: h) Educational reform not implemented
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2008
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-08/32.COM/7A
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Educational reform not implemented.
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2007
Document Source:  WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Educational reform not implemented
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2006
Document Source:  WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Properties
Categories

Regions
States Parties
Ecuador

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.