English Français
Help preserve sites now!

State of Conservation (SOC)

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
16
Reports
5
Properties
1
States Parties
Germany
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC.02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC.02/CONF.202/17
Threats*:Ground transport infrastructure
Germany
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC.01/CONF.205/05,WHC.01/CONF.208/10
Threats*:Ground transport infrastructure
Germany
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC.00/CONF.204/10
Threats*:Ground transport infrastructure
Germany
Year: 2009
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A
Threats*:Ground transport infrastructure
Germany
Year: 2008
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7A
Threats*:Ground transport infrastructure
Germany
Year: 2007
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A
Threats*:Ground transport infrastructure
Germany
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*:Ground transport infrastructure
Germany
Year: 2004
Other Threats: Fire
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*:Ground transport infrastructure
Germany
Year: 2001
Other Threats: Impact of the Havel waterway improvement project on the cultural landscape
Document Source: WHC.01/CONF.205/05,WHC.01/CONF.208/10
Threats*:Ground transport infrastructure
Germany
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B
Threats*:Ground transport infrastructure
Germany
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add
Threats*:Ground transport infrastructure
Germany
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add
Threats*:Ground transport infrastructure
Germany
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*:Ground transport infrastructure
Germany
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*:Ground transport infrastructure
Germany
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*:Ground transport infrastructure
Germany
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*:Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties
Germany
Properties
Categories
Regions


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.