English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
13
Reports
4
Properties
1
States Parties
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2001
Document Source:  WHC.01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Risk of collapse
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2009
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2003
Document Source:  WHC.03/27.COM/07B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2016
Document Source:  WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2007
Document Source:  WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2003
Document Source:  WHC.03/27.COM/07B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2001
Document Source:  WHC.01/CONF.205/05
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Deterioration of the stones
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  1999
Document Source:  WHC.99/CONF.204/05
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Deterioration of the stones
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  1998
Document Source:  WHC.98/CONF.203/08Rev
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Deterioration of the stones
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  1997
Document Source:  WHC.97/CONF.204/02B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Deterioration of the stones
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  1995
Document Source:  WHC.95/CONF.203/05,WHC.95/CONF.201/04,WHC.95/CONF.203/05 Add.1
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Deterioration of the stones
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  1994
Document Source:  WHC.94/CONF.003/06
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Deterioration of the stones
Properties
Categories

Regions
States Parties
Egypt


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.