English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
9
Reports
3
Properties
3
States Parties
States Parties:  Morocco
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Major linear utilities
Other Threats: The general state of conservation of the property is a cause for concern
States Parties:  Syrian Arab Republic
Year:  2017
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC/17/41.COM/7A.Add,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev
Threats*: Major linear utilities
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks
States Parties:  Syrian Arab Republic
Year:  2016
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Major linear utilities
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks
States Parties:  Syrian Arab Republic
Year:  2015
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-15/39.COM/7A,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev
Threats*: Major linear utilities
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks
States Parties:  Syrian Arab Republic
Year:  1999
Document Source:  WHC.99/CONF.204/05
Threats*: Major linear utilities
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks
States Parties:  Syrian Arab Republic
Year:  1998
Document Source:  WHC.98/CONF.203/08Rev
Threats*: Major linear utilities
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks
States Parties:  Syrian Arab Republic
Year:  1997
Document Source:  WHC.97/CONF.204/02B
Threats*: Major linear utilities
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks
States Parties:  Syrian Arab Republic
Year:  1994
Document Source:  WHC.94/CONF.001/03B
Threats*: Major linear utilities
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks
States Parties:  Algeria
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Major linear utilities
Other Threats: vegetation with roots seriously affecting archaeological remains
Properties
Categories

Regions


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.