English Français
Please note that given the exceptional circumstances related to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, regular mail sent to the World Heritage Centre in Paris cannot be processed on a normal basis for the moment. To avoid any delays in the treatment of statutory and/or general correspondence, please send systematically to the concerned addressee within the World Heritage Centre an electronic copy of all the correspondence you may wish to transmit. Thank you for your understanding.

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
13
Reports
4
Properties
3
States Parties
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco peru Peru 2004 Input of excess energy,
Other Threats: Deliberate neglect of historic properties
No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 1994 Input of excess energy,
Other Threats: Need for an inventory of the park's natural and cultural resources
No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2003 Input of excess energy, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2001 Input of excess energy, Yes
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2000 Input of excess energy, Yes
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 1999 Input of excess energy, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 1998 Input of excess energy, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 1997 Input of excess energy, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 1992 Input of excess energy, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 1991 Input of excess energy, No
iguazu national parkIguazu National Park argentina Argentina 1993 Input of excess energy, No
iguazu national parkIguazu National Park argentina Argentina 1992 Input of excess energy, No
iguazu national parkIguazu National Park argentina Argentina 1991 Input of excess energy, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.