English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
14
Reports
1
Properties
0
States Parties
States Parties:  Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year:  2019
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC/19/43.COM/7A.Add.3
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
States Parties:  Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year:  2018
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC/18/42.COM/7A.Add.2.Corr,WHC/18/42.COM/7A.Add2
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
States Parties:  Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year:  2017
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC/17/41.COM/7A.Add2
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
States Parties:  Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year:  2016
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add.2
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
States Parties:  Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year:  2015
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
States Parties:  Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year:  2014
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-14/38.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
States Parties:  Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year:  2013
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-13/37.COM/7A.Add.2
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
States Parties:  Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year:  2012
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
States Parties:  Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year:  2011
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments;
States Parties:  Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year:  2010
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments;
States Parties:  Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year:  2009
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
States Parties:  Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year:  2008
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-08/32.COM/7A.Add.2
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: a) Natural risk factors b) Deterioration of monuments
States Parties:  Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year:  2007
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-07/31.COM/7A.Add.2,WHC-07/31.COM/7A.Add.3
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Natural risk factorsDeterioration of monuments
States Parties:  Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year:  2006
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-06/30.COM/7A.Add.Rev
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monument

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.