English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
States Parties
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
bahla fortBahla Fort oman Oman 2005 Legal framework,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the earthen structure of the Fort
chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone peru Peru 2005 Legal framework,
Other Threats: Risk of desintegration and destruction of structures, surfaces and decorative art
fort and shalamar gardens in lahoreFort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore pakistan Pakistan 2005 Legal framework,
Other Threats: a) Lack of capacity in conservation techniques; b) Lack of monitoring system
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi india India 2005 Legal framework,
Other Threats: rural poverty
historic centre of rigaHistoric Centre of Riga latvia Latvia 2005 Legal framework, No
historic centre of shakhrisyabzHistoric Centre of Shakhrisyabz uzbekistan Uzbekistan 2005 Legal framework, No
imperial palaces of the ming and qing dynasties in beijing and shenyangImperial Palaces of the Ming and Qing Dynasties in Beijing and Shenyang china China 2005 Legal framework, No
madriu-perafita-claror valleyMadriu-Perafita-Claror Valley andorra Andorra 2005 Legal framework, No
mahabodhi temple complex at bodh gayaMahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya india India 2005 Legal framework, No
rice terraces of the philippine cordillerasRice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras philippines Philippines 2005 Legal framework, Yes
royal palaces of abomeyRoyal Palaces of Abomey benin Benin 2005 Legal framework,
Other Threats: Serious degradation of nearly 2/3 of the mud-brick constructions
ruins of kilwa kisiwani and ruins of songo mnaraRuins of Kilwa Kisiwani and Ruins of Songo Mnara united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2005 Legal framework,
Other Threats: - Collapsing monuments- No participation of communit
state historical and cultural park “ancient merv”State Historical and Cultural Park “Ancient Merv” turkmenistan Turkmenistan 2005 Legal framework, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.