jump to the content

State of Conservation (SOC)

Results

19 SOC reports
19 Property(ies)
18 States Parties
Date Start: 1989
Date end: 1989

By Year
Properties by Region
Properties by Category
  • Everglades National Park (1989)
    United States of America
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Housing, Industrial areas, Crop production,
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Garamba National Park (1989)
    Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan,
    Danger List: Yes
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Ichkeul National Park (1989)
    Tunisia
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Water infrastructure, Air pollution, Livestock farming/grazing of domesticated animals, Subsistence hunting, Water,
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Kathmandu Valley  (1989)
    Nepal
    Year: 1989
    Threats*:
    Other Threats: Collapse of the roof of a Temple
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.004/12

  • Mana Pools National Park, Sapi and Chewore Safari Areas (1989)
    Zimbabwe
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Oil and gas, Illegal activities,
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Manas Wildlife Sanctuary (1989)
    India
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Land conversion, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Civil unrest,
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Manú National Park (1989)
    Peru
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Oil and gas,
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (1989)
    Côte d'Ivoire
    Guinea
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure, Mining, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, Financial resources,
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1989)
    Tanzania, United Republic of
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Management systems/ management plan, Financial resources,
    Danger List: Yes
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05,SC.89/CONF.004/11

  • Niokolo-Koba National Park (1989)
    Senegal
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Palace and Park of Versailles (1989)
    France
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.004/12

  • Río Plátano Biosphere Reserve (1989)
    Honduras
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities,
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Sangay National Park (1989)
    Ecuador
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Taï National Park (1989)
    Côte d'Ivoire
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Crop production, Mining, Illegal activities,
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Te Wahipounamu – South West New Zealand (1989)
    New Zealand
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Water infrastructure,
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Tipasa (1989)
    Algeria
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Earthquake,
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.004/12

  • Venice and its Lagoon (1989)
    Italy
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation,
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.004/12

  • Wood Buffalo National Park (1989)
    Canada
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Localised utilities,
    Other Threats: 50% of the bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Yellowstone National Park (1989)
    United States of America
    Year: 1989
    Threats*:
    Other Threats: Fire
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05



* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.