jump to the content

State of Conservation (SOC)

Results

19 SOC reports
19 Property(ies)
18 States Parties
Date Start: 1989
Date end: 1989

By Year
Properties by Region
Properties by Category
  • Everglades National Park (1989)
    United States of America
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Crop production Housing Industrial areas
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Garamba National Park (1989)
    Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Illegal activities Management systems/ management plan
    Danger List: Yes
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Ichkeul National Park (1989)
    Tunisia
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Air pollution Livestock farming/grazing of domesticated animals Subsistence hunting Water (rain/water table) Water infrastructure
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Kathmandu Valley  (1989)
    Nepal
    Year: 1989
    Threats*:
    Other Threats: Collapse of the roof of a Temple
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.004/12

  • Mana Pools National Park, Sapi and Chewore Safari Areas (1989)
    Zimbabwe
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Illegal activities Oil and gas
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Manas Wildlife Sanctuary (1989)
    India
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Civil unrest Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community Illegal activities Land conversion
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Manú National Park (1989)
    Peru
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Oil and gas
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (1989)
    Côte d'Ivoire
    Guinea
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Financial resources Ground transport infrastructure Illegal activities Management systems/ management plan Mining
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1989)
    Tanzania, United Republic of
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Financial resources Management systems/ management plan
    Danger List: Yes
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05,SC.89/CONF.004/11

  • Niokolo-Koba National Park (1989)
    Senegal
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Illegal activities Management systems/ management plan
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Palace and Park of Versailles (1989)
    France
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.004/12

  • Río Plátano Biosphere Reserve (1989)
    Honduras
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community Illegal activities
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Sangay National Park (1989)
    Ecuador
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community Management systems/ management plan
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Taï National Park (1989)
    Côte d'Ivoire
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Crop production Illegal activities Mining
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Te Wahipounamu – South West New Zealand (1989)
    New Zealand
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Water infrastructure
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Tipasa (1989)
    Algeria
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Earthquake
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.004/12

  • Venice and its Lagoon (1989)
    Italy
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.004/12

  • Wood Buffalo National Park (1989)
    Canada
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Localised utilities
    Other Threats: 50% of the bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Yellowstone National Park (1989)
    United States of America
    Year: 1989
    Threats*:
    Other Threats: Fire
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05



* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.