jump to the content
Advanced search

State of Conservation (SOC)

Results

7 SOC reports
1 Property(ies)
1 States Parties
Property: 303

Exports

 Table View
 List view
 Statistics
 Excel file

By Year
Properties by Region
Properties by Category

  • Iguazu National Park (2012)
    Argentina
    Year: 2012
    Threats*: Water infrastructure, Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation, Illegal activities, Governance, Management systems/ management plan, Financial resources,
    Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add

  • Iguazu National Park (2010)
    Argentina
    Year: 2010
    Threats*: Housing, Water infrastructure, Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, Financial resources,
    Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add

  • Iguazu National Park (2008)
    Argentina
    Year: 2008
    Threats*: Housing, Water infrastructure, Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation, Management systems/ management plan, Financial resources,
    Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add

  • Iguazu National Park (2007)
    Argentina
    Year: 2007
    Threats*: Housing, Water infrastructure, Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, Management systems/ management plan, Financial resources,
    Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B

  • Iguazu National Park (1992)
    Argentina
    Year: 1992
    Threats*: Input of excess energy, Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation,
    Document Source: WHC.92/CONF.002/12

  • Iguazu National Park (1991)
    Argentina
    Year: 1991
    Threats*: Input of excess energy, Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation,
    Document Source: SC.91/CONF.002/15

  • Iguazu National Park (1986)
    Argentina
    Year: 1986
    Threats*: Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: CC.86/CONF.003/INF.4,CC.86/CONF.001/11


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.