Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

7
Reports
6
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:1992close
Threats* : Management activitiesclose
Abu Mena (1992)
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 1992
Document Source: CLT-92/CONF.003/2,WHC-92/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Management activities
Ancient City of Damascus (1992)
States Parties: Syrian Arab Republic
Year: 1992
Document Source: WHC-92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Management activities
Ħal Saflieni Hypogeum (1990)
States Parties: Malta
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/3
Threats*: Management activities
Kathmandu Valley (1992)
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 1992
Document Source: WHC-92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
Kathmandu Valley (1991)
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/3
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
Monastery of Batalha (1990)
States Parties: Portugal
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/3
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Poor quality of the stone and weaknesses in the resistance; Cracks; Consolidation work is not undertaken
Monastery of the Hieronymites and Tower of Belém in Lisbon (1990)
States Parties: Portugal
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/3
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Poor quality of the stone and weaknesses in the resistance; Cracks; Consolidation work is not undertaken
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Egypt Malta Nepal Portugal Syrian Arab Republic
Threats
Management activities 7

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top