Year of inscription on the World Heritage List
Historic Town of Zabid: 1993
Historic Town of Zabid: (ii)(iv)(vi)
Previous Committee Decisions:
See page http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/475
See page http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/475
Year(s) of inscription on the List of World Heritage in Danger
Threats for which the property was inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger The Yemeni government asked for Zabid to be inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger to facilitate its preservation.
Threats for which the property was inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger
The Yemeni government asked for Zabid to be inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger to facilitate its preservation.
Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger
Corrective measures identified
In its Decision 31 COM 7A.19 (Christchurch, 2007), the World Heritage Committee defined the measures to be taken urgently to reverse the decline :
a) Adequate legal and institutional framework set up in one year:
(i) Re-issuance of Cabinet Decree No.425 - 2006;
(ii) Government provision to GOPHCY in Sana'a and Zabid of adequate budget to stabilize the degradation of the World Heritage property;
(iii) Completion of heritage protection laws;
(iv) Completion of the draft Conservation Plan, with translation into Arabic. Provision of short version for wide dissemination;
b) Physical degradation stopped immediately and reversed within two years:
(i) Stopping of poor new construction and further degradation of protected heritage assets,
(ii) Approval of contractors and individual specialists for carrying out emergency conservation works,
(iii)Appropriate house improvement design - bathrooms and kitchens, infrastructure and air conditioning,
(iv)Good designs for new houses within Zabid;
(v)Starting demolition of the concrete walls on the streets and other public spaces and replacing with brick walls,
(vi)Planned, costed and programmed schedule of medium and long-term actions,
(vii)Prescription rules and regulations to be followed by inhabitants and owners;
(viii) Adoption of Zabid Urban Development Plan.
Timeframe for the implementation of the corrective measures
As set out in Decision 31 COM 7A.19: “adequate legal and institutional framework set up in one year (2008); the physical degradation stopped immediately and reversed within two years (2009)”.
Requests Approved: 0
Total Amount Approved: 159,167USD
|2004||Assistance for the publication of a book||5,000 USD|
|2003||Safeguarding the Historic Town of Zabid||40,000 USD|
|2001||Historic City of Zabid (APPROVAL OF THE SECOND HALF-NOT IMPLEMENTED)||25,000 USD|
|2001|| Historic City of Zabid (APPROVAL OF THE FIRST HALF-PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED)
Reapproval: 22 Jan, 2002 (n°1486 - 31,918 USD)
|1999||Exposition of the photographs of the architectures in Yemen||167 USD|
|1998||Construction of the furnace for making mud bricks, a restoration material in Zabid||19,000 USD|
|1994||Preparation of a publication on Zabid||15,000 USD|
|1994||Urgent protection works in the Historical Town of Zabid||30,000 USD|
UNESCO Extra-budgetary Funds
Total amount provided to the property: USD 10,000 from the Italian Funds-in-Trust; USD 4,000 from the France-UNESCO Co-operation Agreement.
Previous monitoring missions
2002 and 2003: international expertise; December 2004: World Heritage Centre mission; January 2007: Joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission; January 2009: World Heritage Centre mission.
|2007||Mission Report, Historic Town of Zabid (Yemen), Joint Monitoring Mission 17th - 26th January 2007|
Factors affecting the property identified in previous reports
a) Serious degradation of the city’s heritage (many houses and the ancient souq are in an alarming deterioration state);
b) Large percentage of the city's houses replaced by inappropriate concrete buildings;
c) Large sections of the city’s open spaces have been privatized, either illegally or informally and more than 30% of these built-up;
d) Lack of conservation measures and supportive developments.
Current conservation issues
At its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007), the World Heritage Committee agreed to defer consideration of removing the property from the World Heritage List if specific and agreed measures were taken to reverse the severe decline in the conservation and economy of the city through a legal and institutional framework being set up in one year (2008) and the physical degradation stopped immediately and reversed within two years (2009). The State Party report for 2009 requested a further three years to demonstrate progress with reversing decline.
The State Party submitted a progress report on 8 March 2010 responding to the decision of the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009) and reported on overall progress with reversing decline, notably the conservation of houses, souq and streets and on associated economic and social development.
Overall the State Party maintains that progress continues to be made and it reiterates that since June 2007, and the launching of the SFD (Social Fund for Development)/GTZ (German Agency for Technical Cooperation) project, the momentum in Zabid has drastically changed thanks to the project’s efficient activities, a better coordination between the stakeholders, the continuous financial efforts of the Government and investment by the SFD. Furthermore, the office of General Organization for the Preservation of Historic Cities in Yemen (GOPHCY) in Zabid has been restructured and supported by new staff.(It now has some 33 staff members (professionals, engineers, architects, lawyer, craftsmen, etc.). The housing rehabilitation programme has reached more than 200 complete interventions spread all over the city and the souq rehabilitation and revitalisation project has succeeded in rehabilitating and revitalising over 320 shops in total. The business promotion and community development measures that were launched last year in parallel to the revitalization program of the old souq and the housing rehabilitation program are now said to be impacting on the situation in a very positive way.
The report of the State Party provides information on the progress in implementing the corrective measures, as follows:
a) Adequate legal and institutional framework:
i) Re-issuance of Cabinet Decree No.425 – 2006: This was issued in November 2007;
ii) Government provision to General Organization for the Preservation of Historic Cities in Yemen (GOPHCY): GOPHCY Zabid branch is now having a regular budget and the Minister of Culture is continuing to give an important additional annual allocation from the Fund for Cultural Development, while the GTZ/SFD project is pursuing its support to the GOPHCY office through budgets to finance staff overtimes, capacity building support and financial contributions for the removal of certain violations.
iii) Completion of heritage protection laws: This is said to have been delayed due to funding problems. However, the Government has agreed to create a Ministerial Committee to pursue the matter.
iv) Completion of the Conservation Plan The conservation plan is still being finalised. The State Party reports that a spatial strategy and a housing rehabilitation strategy, based on subsidies to the private households, are also being developed. A draft management plan has also been formulated which would be finalised in the second half of 2010 once the urban conservation plan has been adopted.
b) Physical degradation to be stopped immediately and reversed within two years (five years):
The control of building activities is much more effective and people are now almost systematically applying for building or rehabilitation permissions (thanks to the positive effect of the housing rehabilitation programme and to the improvement of the functioning of the GOPHCY office in Zabid).
i) Stopping of poor new construction and further degradation of protected heritage assets: The State Party reports that illegal constructions are no longer tolerated and measures are regularly taken to mitigate them. Even so, more efforts are still needed to convince mainly the court and the police departments to cooperate in the removal of violations. The State Party reports that GTZ and GOPHCY are discussing a strategy for handling the violations and/or mitigating them. The final approved regulations which are being prepared together with the Conservation Plan are due to be finalised at the end of June 2010.
ii) Approval of contractors and individual specialists for carrying out emergency conservation works, and appropriate house improvement design: The State Party reports that the Housing rehabilitation programme has trained teams of specialists restorers comprising architects, master builders and young professionals under the supervision of GOPHCY and Old Master builders have been hired by the GTZ/SFD project. This is a learning by doing process and has involved more than 350 interventions on properties randomly spread in the city.
iii) Good designs for new houses within Zabid: No information is provided.
iv) Starting demolition of the concrete walls on the streets and other public spaces and replacing with brick walls: No information is provided.
v) Planned, costed and programmed schedule of medium and long-term actions: The State Party states that is has started to develop baseline surveys and documentation of significant monuments and ruins.
vi) Prescription rules and regulations to be followed by inhabitants and owners: No information is provided.
vii) Adoption of Zabid Urban Development Plan: It is reported that a task force has been created under the leadership of the GTZ project, with staff from GOPHCY and GALSUP (planning authority), who will have to finalise an Urban Conservation Plan before end of April 2010, then send it to the stakeholders and authorities for discussion and approval.
In addition, within the framework of the Periodic Reporting exercise, the State Party has submitted a draft Retrospective Statement of Outstanding Universal Value.
Unfortunately, due to security constraints, the reactive monitoring mission requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session could not take place and therefore the Desired state of conservation has not been drafted,
The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies acknowledge the momentum that has now been established to reverse the decline and degradation that faced Zabid, the increased resources now allocated to GOPHCY, and the progress with specialised contractors. The State Party report was helpful in setting out areas of progress and the substantial help of the GTZ/SFD project in linking heritage renewal to social and economic development, through capacity building and education.
Some progress has been made towards implementing the corrective measures and the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies urge the State Party to continue this progress by giving priority to the development of clear rules and regulations defining what is permitted and what constitutes a violation, by finalising and implementing the Conservation Plan, by approving and implementing the Urban Conservation Plan, by drafting and approving a Management Plan and by providing adequate resources to allow the Heritage Protection Bill to be finalised and approved. This would provide the much needed framework for the overall restoration, regeneration and building control programmes.
Decision Adopted: 34COM 7A.21
The World Heritage Committee,
1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add,
2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.19, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009),
3. Notes the progress that has been made in generating political support and commitment to the conservation of Zabid and the increase in resources for the General Organization for the Preservation of Historic Cities in Yemen (GOPHCY), supplemented by the German Technical Assistance (GTZ), the Yemeni Government and the Social Fund for Development (SFD) socio-economic development project;
4. Notes however that more progress is needed to meet the corrective measures in terms of defining clear regulations for what is permitted and what constitutes a violation, finalizing and implementing the Conservation Plan, approving and implementing the Urban Conservation Plan, drafting and approving a Management Plan and providing adequate resources to allow the Heritage Protection Bill to be finalized, as well as defining a clearly budgeted strategy, and setting out rules for house owners and inhabitants;
5. Urges the State Party to continue to give the optimum support to the regeneration and conservation of Zabid in order to make progress with these measures;
6. Requests the State Party to invite a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission to assess progress on the 2007 action plan for the implementation of the corrective measures, to develop a proposal for the Desired State of Conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger and revise the timeframe;
7. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre by 1 February 2011 a progress report on the above for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 35th session in 2011;
8. Decides to retain the Historic Town of Zabid (Yemen) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Decision Adopted: 34COM 8C.2
The World Heritage Committee,
1. Following the examination of the state of conservation reports of properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger (WHC-10/34.COM/7A, WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add and WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add.2),
2. Decides to retain the following properties on the List of World Heritage in Danger:
Decision Adopted: 34COM 8E
The World Heritage Committee,
1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/8E,
2. Adopts the retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value, as presented in the Annex I of Documents WHC-10/34.COM/8E, WHC-10/34.COM/8E.Add and WHC-10/34.COM/8E.Add.2 for the following World Heritage properties:
3. Decides that retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value for World Heritage properties in Danger will be reviewed in priority;
4. Further decides that, considering the high number of retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value to be examined, the order in which they will be reviewed will follow the Second Cycle of Periodic Reporting, namely: