Year of inscription on the World Heritage List 2016
Year(s) of inscription on the List of World Heritage in Danger N/A
Previous Committee Decisions see page http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1490/documents/
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved: USD 30,000
For details, see page http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1490/assistance/
UNESCO Extra-budgetary Funds
Previous monitoring missions
Factors affecting the property identified in previous reports
Factors identified at the time of inscription in 2016:
Illustrative material see page http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1490/
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2018
On 1 February 2018, the State Party of Uzbekistan submitted a report on the state of conservation of the Uzbek components of this serial property, which is available at http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1490/documents/, and provides the following information:
On 9 April 2018, the State Party of Kazakhstan submitted a report on the state of conservation of the property, also available at http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1490/documents/. With regards to the trilateral MoC, the State Party provides some further details regarding the process by which the draft was developed and notes that signing of the MoC has been delayed since mid-2017, due to significant ongoing changes in the management system of protected areas in Uzbekistan. A copy of the MoC (in Russian) was submitted by the State Party with its report.
Regarding the Kazakh components of the property, the State Party informs that the boundaries of the Sairam-Ugam component have been revised. Specifically, the areas within the Limited Economic Use zone of the Sairam-Ugam National Park (ca. 60,628 ha according to the information provided in the report) are proposed to be included in the buffer zone of the property. Some technical mistakes regarding the boundaries of the property were also noted and maps of the proposed revised and adjusted boundaries have been submitted by the State Party with its report.
The State Party of Kyrgyzstan did not submit a report on the state of conservation of the property.
Analysis and Conclusions of the World Heritage Centre and IUCN
The information provided by the States Parties of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan regarding the elaboration of a trilateral MoC on the management and protection of the property is welcomed. It is, however, regrettable that it has not yet been signed by all three States Parties and it is therefore recommended that the Committee urge the States Parties to complete the signing of the MoC as soon as possible and to expedite the actions required to operationalize the MoC, once duly signed by all three States Parties, particularly with regards to the establishment of the planned joint steering committee, which would assume coordinating functions. Development of a functioning transboundary management framework for the property will require additional efforts and in this regard, it should be recalled that in its Decision 40 COM 8B.9, the Committee also requested the States Parties to work in consultation with IUCN to build capacity on transnational management of the property.
With regards to the information provided by the State Party of Uzbekistan regarding the management provisions for the Bashkizilsay and Maydantal areas of the Chatkal Biosphere Reserve component of the property, it is recommended that the Committee request the State Party to clarify the role of the railway company in the protection of the property, and provide more detailed information regarding potential changes in the management system that result from these decrees, and possible impacts on the conservation of the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property.
The information provided by the State Party of Kazakhstan regarding the revision of the boundaries on the Sayram-Ugam component of the property is noted. However, it should be recalled that any proposed changes to the boundaries of the property should be officially submitted by the States Parties in the form of a proposal for boundary modifications. It is noted with concern that some of the changes outlined in the information provided by the State Party of Kazakhstan appear to propose exclusion of a large area from the boundaries of the property, to be instead included in its buffer zone. It should be stressed that changes to the boundaries should only be proposed with the aim of enhancing representation and protection of the property’s OUV, and that in its Decision 40 COM 8B.9, the Committee requested the States Parties to review and rationalize the boundaries of the components of the property and their buffer zones to ensure that they fully correspond to criterion (x), follow ecological principles and address connectivity. Areas originally included into the property for their paleontological values in relation to criterion (viii) should also be excluded, since the property was inscribed under criterion (x) only. It is therefore recommended that the Committee reiterate its request to the States Parties to review and rationalize the boundaries of the property, and to develop, as a matter of priority, a joint proposal for a significant boundary modification, in accordance with Paragraph 165 of the Operational Guidelines. It is further recommended that the Committee encourage the States Parties to consider, as part of the boundary modification process, the potential of the property to also meet criterion (ix), in addition to criterion (x).
Finally, it is regrettable that the State Party of Kyrgyzstan did not submit a report on the state of conservation of the Kyrgyz components of the property. It is therefore recommended that the Committee request the States Parties to submit joint reports on the state of conservation of the entire transboundary property for examination by the Committee in the future.
Decision Adopted: 42 COM 7B.69
The World Heritage Committee,