Year of inscription on the World Heritage List 1983
Year(s) of inscription on the List of World Heritage in Danger N/A
Previous Committee Decisions see page http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/225/documents/
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved: USD 15,000
For details, see page http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/225/assistance/
UNESCO Extra-budgetary Funds
Total amount granted: financial support from the Participation Programme of UNESCO for development of a strategy for sustainable tourism (2010)
Previous monitoring missions
2002, 2004: Joint World Heritage Centre / IUCN reactive monitoring missions; 2011: World Heritage Centre reactive monitoring mission
Factors affecting the property identified in previous reports
Illustrative material see page http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/225/
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2014
On 24 January 2014, the State Party submitted a report on the state of conservation of the property, which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/225/documents. The report provides the following information:
Analysis and Conclusions of the World Heritage Centre and IUCN
The confirmation that the suggested amendments that would have weakened the protection of the buffer zone will not be submitted to the Council of Ministers for approval is welcomed. It is also noted that the State Party considers that recent approvals for maintenance of infrastructure in the buffer zone were in line with the management objectives of PNP.
The completion, adoption and implementation of the new management plan will be key to ensuring the integrity of the property. However, there is concern that the new management plan could consider permitting new ski infrastructure development projects in the buffer zone which could impact the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV). Although the State Party indicates that the management plan, as a framework document, is not subject to EIA and AA, it is considered that the management plan should define the strategic scope of possible infrastructure developments, including those that might compromise the OUV of the property, and therefore a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) would be advisable, in line with the EU SEA Directive and Article 6(3) of the EU Habitats Directive. It will be crucial for the State Party to ensure that the further elaboration of the management plan includes comprehensive public participation and expert consultation. Therefore, it is recommended that the World Heritage Committee request the State Party to ensure that the new management plan, in case it foresees new infrastructure developments in the buffer zone, will be subject to a SEA prior to being finalized and adopted.
The State Party’s intention to include provisions in the new management plan for the implementation of the remaining recommendations of the 2011 joint World Heritage Centre/IUCN reactive monitoring mission is noted. However, it is recommended that the Committee request the State Party to expedite the implementation of the mission’s recommendations, as the completion of the new management plan is not expected before October 2015.
The World Heritage Centre and IUCN received reports that express concern about the extent of planned logging activities inside the property and their impact on its OUV. This information was duly communicated to the State Party in accordance with Paragraph 174 of the Operational Guidelines.
Decision Adopted: 38 COM 7B.73
The World Heritage Committee,