jump to the content
Advanced search

State of Conservation (SOC)

Jesuit Missions of the Guaranis: San Ignacio Mini, Santa Ana, Nuestra Señora de Loreto and Santa Maria Mayor (Argentina), Ruins of Sao Miguel das Missoes (Brazil) (1993)

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds
International Assistance granted to the property

Requests Approved: 0 (from1988-1988)
Total Amount Ap proved: 10,000USD

1988   Financial contribution to the inventory of the documentation on ...   10,000  USD
1988   Financial contribution to the conservation of the Jesuit missions ...  
Missions**
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
Corrective Measures
Current conservation issues

[Oral report by ICOMOS and the Secretariat] 

Conclusion
Decision

  • Adopted

  • Draft Decision

17COMX
Link to the decision

Jesuit Missions of Guaranis (Argentina/Brazil)

The Missions of Guaranis are nowadays used for tourist purposes and research. They are located in an aggressive natural environment. The successful restoration of the Missions on Brazilian territory was almost completed. Regarding the Argentina missions, restoration activities have focused on one mission, San Ignacio Mini. A more global approach was recommended as well as increased sub­regional cooperation. The Brazilian Delegation informed -the Committee that steps towards such cooperation were already being taken by the countries of MERCOSUR (Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay).

 

 No draft Decision

Jesuit Missions of the Guaranis: San Ignacio Mini, Santa Ana, Nuestra Señora de Loreto and Santa Maria Mayor (Argentina), Ruins of Sao Miguel das Missoes (Brazil)
State Party:
Brazil
Argentina
Date of Inscription: 1983
Nomination records (Year): 1982, 1983
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (iv)
Exports
Word File
SOC Reports (year)
2004
1993
Threats*
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Other Threats:
    Aggressive natural environment
Documents
WHC.93/CONF.002/14
Other Documents:
View inscribed site documents, nomination file, reports, decisions, ...
SOC ID: 1773

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.