jump to the content

State of Conservation (SOC)

Ruins of the Buddhist Vihara at Paharpur (2004)

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds
International Assistance granted to the property

Requests Approved: 0 (from1986-1986)
Total Amount Ap proved: 20,000USD

1986   Installation of a drainage system at Paharpur   20,000  USD
Missions**
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports

Lack of capacity in conservation techniques; Lack of management mechanism (including legislation); Lack of monitoring system; Lack of human or financial resources.

Additional Details:

Deterioration of the authentic characteristics of the property

Corrective Measures
Current conservation issues

Following the recommendation resulting from a second UNESCO mission in October 2002, the Government of Bangladesh reported in February 2004 that the moratorium regarding the conservation of the Paharpur Monastery has continued. Upon recommendation by UNESCO consultants, the photographs of terracotta plaques have already been given to the UNESCO Dhaka Office and their inventory is in progress as a precaution against theft and to facilitate future study.

 

With regard to the above-mentioned report of February 2004, ICOMOS commented that no reference had been made to the absence of photographic information and lack of action taken with regard to the “fragmentary terracotta plaques in the custodian’s house”, as reported by the UNESCO mission undertaken in March 2003. In these circumstances, the execution of the work foreseen by UNESCO cannot be evaluated. In addition, regarding the moratorium, ICOMOS suggested that its purpose be made clear to the authorities so that immediate measures be taken for regular inspection and remedial conservation action, as the moratorium could be used to delay or stop minor work being carried out at the property. 

 

Additionally, within the framework of the France-UNESCO convention, the French Government approved a 17,000 Euro project for the organization of a workshop to elaborate an archaeological research strategy on a long-term basis for the Paharpur Vihara. This Workshop took place in March 2004, aiming to evaluate the heritage values, review problems of site management and discuss how to sustainably conserve, preserve and promote the site. A coherent strategy for archaeological research, safeguard, conservation and management of the site was also defined. A draft workplan concerning the conservation of the terracotta plaques and the monument, site and environmental visitor management, and long-term strategies was proposed by the participants.

 

On 30 March 2004, the authorities of Bangladesh submitted two International Assistance requests: one for Training and one for Technical Co-operation for the Paharpur site. The Technical Co-operation request will be included in the working document for International Assistance to be presented at the 28th session of the Committee.

Conclusion
Decision
  • Adopted

  • Draft Decision

28COM15B.53
Link to the decision

The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined the state of conservation of the property, the progress made by the national authorities since the previous session of the World Heritage Committee, and the findings and recommendations of the two UNESCO missions in October 2002 and February 2003, 2. Encouraging the State Party, the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies to maintain efforts to plan and implement enhanced conservation measures for the property, 3. Decides to defer consideration for the inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger until the 29th session of the World Heritage Committee in 2005, in light of the findings and recommendations of the UNESCO missions, to enable the State Party to undertake corrective measures to reverse the negative impact of the work undertaken on the property; 4. Requests the World Heritage Centre, the UNESCO Dhaka Office, the Regional Advisor for Culture in Asia and the Pacific and the Advisory Bodies to provide technical support to the State Party in the implementation of the corrective measures; 5. Further requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre by 1 February 2005, a report on the state of conservation of the property and on the progress achieved in the implementation of the recommendations of the UNESCO missions for examination by the Committee at its 29th session in 2005.

Draft Decision: 28 COM 15B.53

 The World Heritage Committee,

 1.       Having examined the state of conservation of the property, the progress made by the national authorities since the previous session of the World Heritage Committee, and the findings and recommendations of the two UNESCO missions in October 2002 and February 2003,

 2.       Encouraging the State Party, the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies to maintain efforts to plan and implement enhanced conservation measures for the property,

 3.       Decides to defer consideration for the inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger until the 29th session of the World Heritage Committee in 2005, in light of the findings and recommendations of the UNESCO missions, to enable the State Party to undertake corrective measures to reverse the negative impact of the work undertaken on the site; 

 4.       Requests the World Heritage Centre, the UNESCO Dhaka Office, the Regional Advisor for Culture in Asia and the Pacific and the Advisory Bodies to provide technical support to the State Party in the implementation of the corrective measures.

Ruins of the Buddhist Vihara at Paharpur
State Party:
Bangladesh
Date of Inscription: 1985
Nomination records (Year): 1983
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (i)(ii)(vi)
Exports
Word File
SOC Reports (year)
2011
2009
2008
2007
2005
2004
Threats*
  • Illegal activities
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Other Threats:
    Absence of photographic information and lack of action taken with regard to the “fragmentary terracotta plaques in the custodian’s house”


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.