Limited distribution CLT-82/CONF.014/6
Paris, 20 August 1982
Translated from French
UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION
CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE
WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE
Bureau of the World Heritage Committee
Sixth Session
Paris, 21-24 June 1982
REPORT OF THE RAPPORTEUR
I. INTRODUCTION
1. The sixth session of the Bureau of the World Heritage Committee
was held at Unesco Headquarters in Paris from 21 to 24 June 1982
and was attended by Prof. Ralph O. Slatyer (Australia), Chairman,
Mr. Augusto Carlos da Silva Telles (Brazil), Prof. Nicolai Gentchev
(Bulgaria), Mr. Magnus Backes (Federal Republic of Germany), Mr.
Youssouf Diare (Guinea), H. Exc. Mr. Krishna Raj Aryal (Nepal),
Vice-Chairmen, and Mr. Azedine Beschaouch (Tunisia), the
Rapporteur. Five other States Members of the Committee were
represented by observers. Representatives of the International
Council of Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) and of the International
Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN)
and of the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation
and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM) attended the meeting
in an advisory capacity. The full list of participants is to be
found in the Annex of this report.
2. After the meeting had been opened by the Chairman, Mr. Makaminan
Makangiansar, Assistant Director-General for Culture, welcomed the
participants on behalf of the Director-General and drew attention
in particular to the expanding role of the Committee and to the
importance of the various questions submitted for consideration by
the Bureau. In recalling that the 2nd World Conference on Cultural
Policies was to be held very soon, he also stressed the importance
of the notion of safeguarding the heritage in elaborating and
implementing these policies.
*[2]
3. The Assistant Director-General informed the Bureau of the death,
following a grave illness, of Mrs. Reina Torres de Arauz, Director
of Historical Heritage, Panama, and former Vice-Chairman of the
Committee, and of the sudden disappearance of Professor Aloisio
Magalhaès, Secretary for Culture of Brazil and Vice-Chairman of the
Committee. After the Assistant Director-General had paid homage to
them, the Bureau observed a minute's silence in their memory.
4. The Bureau then adopted the agenda for the session with the
addition of the following questions: training activities financed
by the World Heritage Fund, public information activities, the role
of ICCROM, ICOMOS and IUCN and support to the Secretariat.
5. As was foreseen in the agenda, the representative of the
Director-General, Mr. Michel Batisse, Deputy Assistant
Director-General (Science Sector) reported on the activities
undertaken since the fifth session of the Committee. After
recalling the role Mr. Gérard Bolla, now Assistant Director-General
responsible for the Communication Sector, had played in the work of
the Committee, Mr. Batisse noted in particular, on the one hand,
that four other States had ratified or accepted the Convention
since October 1981, bringing the total number of ratifications or
acceptances to sixty-five; and, on the other hand, that due to
voluntary contributions to the World Heritage Fund, the Committee's
financial situation could be considered as comfortable and the
management of the budget well in hand.
6. The Bureau decided to convey its warmest thanks to Mr. Gérard
Bolla for his personal interest and for the important work he
undertook for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention.
II. NOMINATIONS TO THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST AND TO THE LIST OF
WORLD HERITAGE IN DANGER
7. Thirty-eight nominations were presented to the Bureau -
thirty-seven to the World Heritage List and one to the List of
World Heritage in Danger. Twenty-four properties were recommended
for inclusion in the World Heritage List; these are listed in
section A below. Supplementary information was found to be
necessary for certain nominations; this information should be sent
to the Secretariat before the beginning of September 1982 in order
that it can be transmitted to the members of the Committee prior to
the meeting of its sixth session which is to take place during the
first fortnight of November 1982. The four nominations listed in
Section B below were deferred either because their dossiers needed
revision or because a more comprehensive evaluation was required.
The Bureau shared the opinion expressed by ICOMOS and IUCN
respectively, and recommended that the Committee should not
inscribe the five properties listed in section C below on the World
Heritage List. Four other nominations received by the Secretariat
after the deadline were not considered by the Bureau. In this
connection, the Bureau recalled that the Committee had fixed as 1st
January the deadline for receiving nominations to be examined
during the same year. Particular attention was paid to the
nomination submitted by the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan of the 'Old
City of Jerusalem and its Walls' for inscription on the List of
World Heritage in Danger. This nomination is taken up in section D
below. After taking note of the evaluation of each nomination made
by the competent advisory organization, the Bureau formulated the
following recommendations to the Committee.
*[3]
A. Properties recommended for inscription on the World Heritage List
Contracting State
having submitted
the nomination of
the property in
accordance with
Article 11 of the Identif- Criteria
Convention cation Nº Name of property fulfilled
______________________________________________________________________
Algeria 179 Tassili n'Ajjer C(i) + (iii)
" 188 The M'Zab Valley C(ii) + (iii) + (v)
" 191 Djemila C(iii) + (iv)
" 193 Tipasa C(iii) + (iv)
The Bureau recommended that the Algerian authorities should provide a plan for
safeguarding the entire nominated area and to include the royal Mauritanian
mausoleum, known as Kbor er Roumia (the tomb of the Christian) in this
nomination.
" 194 Timgad C(ii) + (iii) + (iv)
The Bureau shared the view of ICOMOS that a zone non aedificandi be defined in
order to preserve not only the overall character but also the archaeological
reserves of this site.
Australia 181 Western Tasmania Wilderness
National Parks N(i),(ii),(iii),(iv)
The Bureau requests the Australian authorities to provide a statement of intent
regarding the construction of dams, on the possibility of extending the protected
area and of establishing a co-ordinating mechanism to manage this site.
" 186 Lord Howe Island Group N(iii) + (iv)
The Bureau requests the Australian authorities to extend the nominated area to
include the lagoon and the coral reef, to provide this property with protection
equal to that of a national park and to supply information on the impact of the
proposed telecommunication towers.
*[4]
Contracting State
having submitted
the nomination of
the property in
accordance with
Article 11 of the Identif- Criteria
Convention cation Nº Name of property fulfilled
______________________________________________________________________
Brazil 189 Historic Centre of Criteria will be iden-
the town of Olinda tified after receiv-
ing the information
requested
The Bureau requests the Brazilian authorities to confirm their intention of
protecting Olinda against the threats associated with the rapid urban development
of Recife and to provide a report on the plan for safeguarding Olinda.
Cuba 204 Old Havana and Criteria will be iden-
its fortifications tified after receiv-
ing the information
requested
The Bureau requests the Cuban authorities to complete the nomination dossier with
a descriptive list of the main monuments of the old city and to provide details
on the safeguarding measures foreseen.
France 203 The Royal Saltworks
of Arc et Senans C(i) + (ii) + (iv)
Haiti 180 National History Park - C(iv) + (vi)
Citadel, Sans Souci Ramiers
The Bureau recommends that the Haitian authorities exercise the greatest care as
regards the on-going consolidation works.
Honduras 196 Rio Platano
Biosphere Reserve N(i), (ii), (iii)+(iv)
Italy 174 The Historic Centre C(i) + (ii) + (iii)
of Florence (iv) + (vi)
Ivory Coast 195 Tai National Park N (iii) + (iv)
The Bureau requests the Ivory Coast authorities to examine the possibility of
nominating this property to the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Libyan Arab 183 Archaeological site
Jamahiraya of Leptis Magna C (i) + (ii) + (iii)
The Bureau, requests the Libyan authorities to precisely delimit the protected
area and to include the fortifications and the ancient necropolises therein.
*[5]
Contracting State
having submitted
the nomination of
the property in
accordance with
Article 11 of the Identif- Criteria
Convention cation Nº Name of property fulfilled
______________________________________________________________________
Libyan Arab 184 Archaeological site Criteria will be iden-
Jamahiraya of Sabratha tified after receiv-
ing the information
requested
The Bureau considers that the information in the documents supporting this
nomination is insufficient and recommends the inscription of this property on the
condition that the Libyan authorities complete the dossier with up-to-date
information, define the limits of the zone of protection and make available an
urban development plan for the new town which provides for the safeguarding of
the archaeological site.
" 190 Archaeological site
of Cyrene C(ii), (iii) + (vi)
Seychelles, 185 Aldabra Atoll N(ii) + (iii) + (iv)
Republic of
Sri Lanka 200 Sacred City of
Anuradhapura C(ii), (iii) + (vi)
" 201 Ancient City of
Polonnaruva C(i), (iii) + (vi)
" 202 Ancient City of
Sigiriya C(ii), (iii) + (iv)
Tanzania 199 Selous Game Reserve N(ii) + (iv)
United States of 198 Cahokia Mounds State
America Historic Site C(iii) + (iv)
Yemen, 192 The old walled
People's Democratic City of Shibam C(iii), (iv) + (v)
Republic of
The Bureau shared the opinion of ICOMOS that the protected area should be
extended to include the valley of the wadi Hadramawt.
*[6]
B. Deferred nominations
Contracting State having sub-
mitted the nomination of the
property (in accordance with
Article 11 of the Convention) Id. Nº Name of property
______________________________________________________________________
Algeria 197 Sidi bu-Medina
The Bureau requests the Algerian authorities to redefine the limits and
strengthen the protection of the nominated area.
Mali 117 National Park of the Baoulé Loop
The Bureau deferred this until the conclusions of the recent UICN mission are
available.
Sri Lanka 182 Sinharaja Forest Reserve
The Bureau requests the Sri Lankan authorities to strengthen the protection of
the site by giving it national park status.
Pakistan 177 Indus Dolphin Reserve
The Bureau recommended that preparatory assistance should be provided in order
to revise the dossier and provide further information on the integrity of the
property.
C. Properties not to be considered for inclusion in the World Heritage List
Federal Republic of Germany 187 The church of St Michael, Hildesheim
Italy 175 Medici villas of the Florentine region
Pakistan 176 Kirthar National Park
" 178 Lal Sohanra Park National
Tanzania 173 Old Stone Town of Zanzibar
*[7]
D. Nomination to the List of World Heritage in Danger
8. On the proposal of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, the Bureau
examined the request for the inclusion of the "Old City of
Jerusalem and its Walls" in the List of World Heritage in Danger.
9. Several members of the Bureau considered that the "Old City of
Jerusalem and its Walls", which is a property inscribed on the
World Heritage List, corresponds to the situation referred to in
Article 11, paragraph 4, of the Convention and that it was
therefore appropriate to recommend that the Committee inscribe it
on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
10. Other members considered that the Bureau did not have at its
disposal all the information which could enable it to formulate a
recommendation.
11. Under these conditions, since a consensus could not be reached
in the Bureau on this nomination, it will be for the Committee, at
its 6th session, to take in this respect the decision which in any
case has to be taken by the Committee.
12. The Bureau recommends that the proposal be accompanied by an
urban development plan for Jerusalem.
13. The Bureau also recommends:
(a) that ICOMOS and IUCN, in collaboration with ICCROM, if
necessary, work out draft "Guidelines for the implementation
of the World Heritage Convention with respect to the inclusion
of properties in the List of World Heritage in Danger";
(b) that ICOMOS continue to assemble information concerning the
nomination relating to the Old City of Jerusalem and its
Walls, with a view to presenting authoritative ana completely
up-to-date advice to the Committee, benefitting, if possible,
from experts' observations.
III. TECHNICAL CO-OPERATION REQUESTS
14. After an exchange of views on the guidelines for the evaluation
of technical co-operation requests, the Bureau recommended that the
Committee should consider how to make a maximum number of States
Parties participate in technical co-operation activities. The
Secretariat informed the Bureau of all the technical co-operation
requests received before 21 June 1982 and indicated that a certain
number of these requests would need further clarifications, which
it had not yet been possible to obtain since they had bean received
only a short time before the meeting. The Bureau decided that,
exceptionally, all these requests would be submitted to the
Committee at its next session. Nevertheless, as from 1983, the
Bureau will consider only those requests received before 1st March
of the given year, this being the deadline that had been fixed by
the Committee. It was noted that this deadline was applicable only
to the projects amounting to over US $ 20,000. Requests for lesser
amounts can be addressed at any time for a decision directly to the
Chairman of the Committee.
*[8]
A. Requests submitted to the Bureau by document CLT-82/CH/CONF.014/4
Bulgaria Two requests for equipment for the preservation of the
Madara Rider and the churches of Soyana and Ivanovo.
Ethiopia Request for a financial contribution for elaborating a
management plan for Simen National Park.
Haiti Request for equipment for the preservation of the
Citadel (recommended for inclusion in the World
Heritage List by the Bureau)
Honduras Request for a financial contribution for implementing
the management plan of the Rio Platano Biosphere
Reserve (recommended for inclusion in the World
Heritage List by the Bureau).
Jordan Request for expert services to undertake an
architectural survey of the monuments of the Old City
of Jerusalem and to prepare a plan for the preservation
work to be undertaken.
Panama Request for equipment and a financial contribution for
the conservation of Darien National Park.
Senegal Two requests for equipment to strengthen protective
measures in Niokolo Koba National Park and another
request for aid in research and surveillance activities
in Djoudj National Park.
Seychelles Request for equipment for the warden station on Aldabra
Atoll (recommended for inclusion in the World Heritage
List by the Bureau).
Tanzania Request for equipment for training courses at the
Collage of Wildlife Management at Mweka.
B. Requests currently being evaluated
Honduras Request for consultant services, equipment and
assistance with training at the Maya site of Copan.
Nepal Two requests for financial assistance, one for the
protection and management of Sagarmatha National Park,
another for restoration and renovation activities in
Kathmandu Valley.
Pakistan Request for training and equipment for a laboratory and
a conservation workshop at Mohenjodaro.
Yugoslavia Request for equipment for the Institute for the
protection of cultural monuments at Kotor.
*[9]
IV. REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE
15. The Bureau granted emergency assistance to the People's
Democratic Republic of Yemen amounting to $20,000 for elaborating
a plan for the installation of a waste water drainage system within
the old city of Shibam.
V. TRAINING
16. The Secretariat reported on the implementation of the training
programme and the Bureau recommended that priority in this
programme should be given to group training activities at the local
and regional levels. As regards the training of individual persons,
the Bureau recommended that the World Heritage Fund be used
essentially for short-term refresher courses. The Fund should be
used only exceptionally to support fellowships for complete
university courses due to the very high costs involved.
VI. MONITORING OF THE CONDITIONS OF PROPERTIES INSCRIBED ON THE
WORLD HERITAGE LIST
17. The Bureau examined a proposal to establish a programme for
monitoring the condition of sites inscribed on the World Heritage
List. The Bureau was aware of the usefulness of a permanent
monitoring system but considered that this proposal was premature,
given the current state of infrastructures in the majority of
countries concerned.
18. In order to obtain periodic reports on the condition of
properties inscribed on the World Heritage List, the Bureau
recommended that the Committee examine how the contracting parties
could be encouraged to obtain analyses and reports at the national
level.
VII. FORM IN WHICH THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST IS TO BE PUBLISHED
19. The Bureau recalled that it was for the Committee to decide in
which form the World Heritage List is to be published.
20. Accordingly, the Bureau recommended that the names of the
properties inscribed on the World Heritage List and the States
having nominated them should be presented under the following
headings:
Contracting State having sub-
mitted the nomination of the
property (in accordance with
Name of property Article 11 of the Convention)
________________ ______________________________
*[10]
VIII. AGENDA FOR THE SIXTH SESSION OF THE COMMITTEE
21. The Bureau adopted the following provisional agenda for the
sixth ordinary session of the Committee:
1. Opening of the session
2. Adoption of the Agenda
3. Election of Chairman, Vice-Chairmen and Rapporteur
4. Report on the sixth session of the Bureau of the World
Heritage Committee (Paris, 21-24 June 1982).
5. Report of the representative of the Director-General on
activities undertaken since the fifth session of the World
Heritage Committee.
6. Tentative lists
7. Nominations to the World Heritage List and to the List of
World Heritage in Danger
8. Statement of accounts of the World Heritage Fund and
budget for 1983.
9. Requests for technical co-operation
10. Training
11. Form in which the World Heritage List is to be published
12. a) Protection and management of properties included in
the World Heritage List
b) Reports on the condition of sites inscribed on the
World Heritage List.
13. Public information activities
14. Report of the Committee to the 22nd session of the General
Conference
15. Other business
16. Closure of the session
IX. OTHER BUSINESS
22. After a wide debate on the written evaluations of properties
nominated to the World Heritage List, in which participated the NGO
representatives, the Bureau recommended that in the future:
a) IUCN should try to give a fuller description of the
properties;
b) ICOMOS should try to further develop comparisons between
the nominated property and other similar properties and
also give more emphasis to the criteria of integrity.
*[11]
23. As regards the "Guidelines for the implementation of the World
Heritage Convention with respect to the inclusion of properties on
the List of World Heritage in Danger", the Bureau recommended that
ICOMOS and IUCN, in collaboration with ICCROM as necessary, should
draft such guidelines for the next session of the Committee, on the
one hand on the basis of paragraphs 4 and 5 of Article 11 of the
Convention, and on the other hand with reference to paragraphs 18
and 23 of the "Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the
World Heritage Convention" (cf. document WHC/2 revised, October
1980).
24. The Bureau decided to defray the costs incurred by ICOMOS and
IUCN notably for expert services, for drafting the above-mentioned
guidelines, out of the contingency budget and on the basis of
estimated costs which would be approved by the Secretariat.
25. After a debate on the role of the Secretariat, the Bureau
recognized the need to increase the number of staff responsible for
implementing the Convention. It recommended on the one hand that
the Committee substantially increase the budget granted to the
Secretariat in order to strengthen its activities, and, on the
other hand, that the States Parties to the Convention should
themselves recommend that World Heritage activities should be also
supported out of the regular budget, notably by strengthening the
Secretariat.
26. The Secretariat informed the Bureau of the progress made in the
promotional activities approved by the Committee at its 5th
session. The Bureau supported the Secretariat's initiatives in this
field and recalled the necessity to increase public information
activities through all possible means. In particular, the Bureau
recommended the Committee to grant a financial contribution for the
production of a special issue of the magazine "AMBIO" on cultural
and natural World Heritage properties. It also expressed the wish
that this special issue, published in English would also be
produced in French and Spanish. Furthermore, the Bureau suggested
that the periodical "MOMENTUM" should make a special issue on the
World Heritage Convention. This suggestion was welcomed by the
President of ICOMOS who will discuss with the Secretariat how to
produce this issue.
27. The Bureau decided, in agreement with the Secretariat, to fix
the dates for the next session of the Committee during the first
fortnight in November 1982.
28. As for the place at which the next session of the Committee
would be held, the Bureau noted that the arrangements for this
meeting had not yet been made by the Pakistan authorities. It is
hoped that these arrangements would be definitively fixed in the
near future in order that the meeting could take place in Pakistan
as foreseen. Moreover, the Bureau thanked the Hashemite Kingdom of
Jordan for the letter confirming its invitation to host the next
session of the Committee, in the event that the Bureau finally
concluded that the meeting could not take place in Pakistan. The
Bureau therefore invited its Chairman, in the event that it was
confirmed that it was impossible to hold the meeting in Pakistan,
to consult the Director-General for the organization of the 6th
session of the Committee, taking duly into account the invitation
received from the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.
29. Lithographs of views of Olinda, drawn by Prof. Aloisio
Magalhaès a short time before his tragic death, were presented
before the closure of the meeting of the Bureau in homage to his
memory.
þ þ
þ
Annex
BUREAU OF THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE / BUREAU DU COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL
6th Session / 6ème Session
Paris, 21-24 June 1982 / Paris, 21-24 juin 1982
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS / LISTE DES PARTICIPANTS
I. STATES MEMBERS OF THE BUREAU/ETATS MEMBRES DU BUREAU
Australia/Australie
Prof. Ralph O. Slatyer Chairman/Président
Professor of Environmental Biology
Australian National University
Canberra
Brazil/Brésil
Mr. Augusto Carlos da Silva Telles Vice-Chairman/Vice-Président
Directeur de la S.P.H.A.N.
Ministère de l'Education et de la Culture
Rio-de-Janeiro
Mr. Isnard G. de Freitas
Conseiller
Délégation permanente auprès de l'Unesco
Bulgaria/Bulgarie
Prof. Nicolai Gentchev Vice-Chairman/Vice-Président
Doyen de la Faculté d'Histoire
Université de Sofia
Germany (Fed. Rep. of)/Allemagne (Rép. fédérale d')
Mr. Magnus Backes
Vice-President of the Bavarian State
Office for Preservation of Ancient
Monuments and Sites
Munich
Guinea/Guinée
Mr. Youssouf Diare Vice-Chairman/Vice-Président
Délégué permanent auprès de l'Unesco
*[ANNEX I/2]
Nepal/Népal
H. Exc. Mr. Krishna Raj Aryal Vice-Chairman/Vice-Président
Ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary
of Nepal to France
Permanent Delegate to Unesco
Mr. N.D. Shrestha
Deputy Permanent Delegate to Unesco
Tunisia/Tunisie
Mr. Azedine Beschaouch Rapporteur
Maitre des Recherches archéologiques
Institut national d'Archéologie
Tunis
Melle Sophie Zaouche
Délégation permanente auprès de l'Unesco
II. OBSERVERS/OBSERVATEURS
A. STATES PARTIES TO THE WORLD HERITAGE: CONVENTION/
ETATS PARTIES A LA CONVENTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL
Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan/Royaume hachémite de Jordanie
S. Exc. T. Masri
Ambassadeur extraordinaire et plénipotentiaire
de la Jordanie en France
Délégué permanent auprès de l'Unesco
Mr. A. Al Tawil
Délégué permanent adjoint auprès de l'Unesco
Senegal/Sénégal
Mr. Lamine Diakhaté
Ministre Conseiller
Délégué permanent adjoint auprès de l'Unesco
Mr. Henri Mendy
Conseiller
Délégation permanente auprès de l'Unesco
Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/
Jamahiriya arabe libyenne populaire et socialiste
Mr. A. H. Zoubi
Délégué permanent adjoine auprès de l'Unesco
*[ANNEX I/3]
Switzerland/Suisse
Mme S. Michl-Keller
Délégué permanent adjoint auprès de l'Unesco
United States of America/Etats-Unis d'Amérique
Mr. Judson Gooding
Cultural Attaché
Permanent Delegation to Unesco
Mr. John Kriendler
Permanent Delegation to Unesco
B. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION/ORGANISATION INTERGOUVERNEMENTALE
Arab Educational, Cultural and Scientific Organization (ALECSO)/
Organisation arabe pour l'éducation, la culture et la science
Mr. Taher Guiga
Directeur général adjoint de la Culture
Mr. Ahmed Derradji
Représentant permanent auprès de l'Unesco
III. ORGANIZATIONS ATTENDING IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY/
ORGANISATIONS PARTICIPANT AVEC UN STATUT CONSULTATIF
- International Council of Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS)/
Conseil international des monuments et des sites
Mr. Michel Parent
Président
Mr. Léon Pressouyre
Professeur à l'Université de Paris I
- International Centre for the study of the preservation and the
restoration of cultural property (ICCROM) / Centre international
d'études pour la conservation et la restauration des biens culturels
Mr. Gaël de Guichen
Assistant scientifique à la formation
- International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural
Resources (IUCN)/ Union internationale pour la conservation
de la nature at de ses ressources
Mr Dan Navid
Executive Officer
IUCN Commission on Environmental Planning and
Commission on Environmental Policy, Law and Administration
*[ANNEX I/4]
IV. SECRETARIAT
Mr. Makaminan Makagiansar
Assistant Director-General for Culture
Mr. Michel Batisse
Deputy Assistant Director-General
Science Sector
Mr. F. Di Castri
Director
Division of Ecological Sciences
Mr. S. Naqvi
Acting Director
Division of Cultural Heritage
Mr. M. El-Mugharbel
Directeur
Division des Etats arabes
Secteur de la coopération en vue du développement
et les relations extérieures
Mme S. Peigné-Tabbara
Chargé de liaison principal
Division des Etats arabes
Secteur de la coopération en vue du développement
et les relations extérieures
Mr. Daniel de San
Chief
International Standards Division
Office of International Standards and Legal Affairs
Mrs. Anne Raidl
Chief, International Standards Section
Division of Cultural Heritage
Mr. Bernd von Droste
Division of Ecological Sciences
Mrs. Margaret van Vliet
Division of Cultural Heritage
Mrs. Jane Robertson
Division of Ecological Sciences
*[EOF]