Distribution Limited WHC-96/CONF.201/INF.21
Paris, 22 October 1996
Original: English
UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL
SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION
CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE
WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE
WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE
Twentieth session
Merida, Yucatan, Mexico
2-7 December 1996
Information Document Glossary of World Heritage Terms (June, 1996)
Glossary of World Heritage Terms
A Glossary of Terms relating to the Implementation of the
World Heritage Convention
June 1996
Preface
This Glossary of World Heritage Terms has been prepared in
accordance with the request of the World Heritage Committee at
its nineteenth session in December 1995. The Committee
requested that the Glossary be a separate document,
independent from, but referring to, the Operational
Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage
Convention and to reports of relevant expert meetings.
Technical notes
(a) Derivation of terms
The Glossary of World Heritage Terms has been prepared
primarily by extracting terms and their definitions and
interpretations from the World Heritage Convention, the
Operational Guidelines and to reports of relevant
expert meetings.
Other documents and publications consulted during the
preparation of the Glossary are listed in the BibliographY.
(b) Format of entries
Each term defined or explained in this Glossary is presented
alphabetically in bold italics.
Within the text of definitions or explanations, additional
terms defined or explained elsewhere in the Glossary are
presented in italics for ease of cross referencing.
Documents, publications and the reports of relevant expert
meetings cited and referred to in the Glossary are included in
the Bibliography.
Table of Contents
Preface
Technical notes
(a) Derivation of terms
(b) Format of entries
Alphabetical Glossary
Alphabetical Index to List of Terms used in Glossary
Bibliography
List of addresses and contacts
Alphabetical Glossary
A
Action Plan for the Future (Cultural Landscapes)
The Action Plan for the Future (Cultural Landscapes)
was prepared by the UNESCO "Expert Meeting on
Cultural Landscapes of Outstanding Universal Value" held in
Templin, Germany in October 1993 (see von Droste et al
1995: Annex 1). The Action Plan outlines
recommendations concerning the provision of "Guidance to
States Parties on the Identification, Assessment, Nomination
and Management of Cultural Landscapes for Inclusion in the
World Heritage List" and on the preparation of a "Thematic
Study on Cultural Landscapes". The Action Plan was
adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its
seventeenth session in 1993 (UNESCO 4 February 1994:
55-56 and Annex VII).
see Cultural landscapes
Advisory bodies
Article 8(3) of the World Heritage Convention
establishes the International Centre for the Study of
the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (Rome
Centre), now known as ICCROM, the International
Council of Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) and the
International Union for the Conservation of Nature and
Natural Resources (IUCN), now known as the
World Conservation Union as advisory bodies to
the World Heritage Committee.
The Operational Guidelines outline the various rôles
of the advisory bodies in relation to the
implementation of the Convention (UNESCO
February 1996).
The advisory bodies are also referred to as
advisory organisations in the Operational
Guidelines (UNESCO February 1996: Paragraphs 49, 50 and
84).
see IUCN, ICOMOS and ICCROM
Assistance
see International assistance, Preparatory
assistance, Emergency assistance, Technical co-
operation, Training
Associative cultural landscape
Associative cultural landscape is one of the
three main categories of cultural landscapes adopted
by the World Heritage Committee at its sixteenth
session in December 1992 (UNESCO 14 December 1992: 54-55) and
included in the Operational Guidelines (UNESCO
February 1996: 11, Paragraph 39).
Paragraph 39 (iii) of the Operational Guidelines
refers to associative cultural landscapes in the
following way:
39.
(iii) The final category is the associative cultural
landscape. The inclusion of such landscapes on
the World Heritage List is justifiable by virtue
of the powerful religious, artistic or cultural
associations of the natural element rather than
material cultural evidence, which may be insignificant
or even absent(UNESCO February 1996: 11, Paragraph 39).
Tongariro National Park in New Zealand and Uluru-Kata
Tjuta National Park in Australia were included in the
World Heritage List as associative cultural
landscapes in 1993 and 1994 respectively (UNESCO 4
February 1994: 39 and UNESCO 31 January 1995: 52).
In April 1995 Australia ICOMOS held an "Asia-Pacific Regional
Workshop on Associative Cultural Landscapes" (von Droste
et al 1995: Annex VI).
see Clearly defined landscape, Continuing
landscape, Cultural landscape, Organically evolved
landscape, Relict (or fossil) landscape
Authenticity
Also known as Test of authenticity and Conditions
of authenticity.
Paragraph 24 of the Operational Guidelines requires
that a cultural property nominated for inclusion in
the World Heritage List be considered for inclusion
only if it meets one or more of the cultural heritage
criteria and the test of authenticity.
Paragraph 24 (b) (i) of the Operational Guidelines as
reproduced below refers to the test of
authenticity.
24.
...
(b) (i) meet the test of authenticity in design,
material, workmanship or setting and in
the case of cultural landscapes their
distinctive character and components (the
Committee stressed the reconstruction is only
acceptable if it is carried out on the basis
of complete and detailed documentation on the
original and to no extent on conjecture)
(UNESCO February 1996: 7).
The text concerning groups of urban buildings included
in the Operational Guidelines also refers to the need
to meet the test of authenticity (UNESCO February
1996: 8, Paragraph 27).
Paragraphs 57 and 58 of the Operational Guidelines
state that cultural properties nominated for
inclusion in the World Heritage List should satisfy
the conditions of authenticity and that the
determination as to whether these conditions are met will be
carried out by ICOMOS (UNESCO February 1996: 18).
Paragraph 64 (e) of the Operational Guidelines states
that "indications as to the authenticity of the property"
should be included in the completed nomination form
under the heading of "Justification for inclusion in the
World Heritage List" (UNESCO February 1996: 20).
Paragraphs 64 (f) (iv) and 78 of the Operational
Guidelines refer to the undefined concept of "historical
authenticity" (UNESCO February 1996: 20 and 28).
It is generally acknowledged that the concept of
authenticity is a vague one and may be subject to
different cultural and social interpretations.
Authenticity and its application in relation to the
World Heritage Convention was the subject of a
conference held in Nara, Japan in November 1994 (Nara
Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage
Convention). A preparatory workshop was held in Bergen
in Norway from 31 January to 2 February 1994. The
proceedings of the preliminary workshop are published in
Larson and Marstein (1994). The Nara Conference
resulted in the adoption of a declaration known as The
Nara Document on Authenticity. The proceedings of the
Nara Conference and the Nara Document on
Authenticity are published in Larson (1995).
In March 1996 an Inter-American Symposium on Authenticity in
the Conservation and Management of Cultural Heritage was held
in San Antonio Texas, U.S.A. The Symposium was co-sponsored
by US/ICOMOS, the Getty Cosnervation Institute and the San
Antonio Conservation Society.
see Conservation, Information sources
Authorization form
An authorization form is included as part of the
nomination form. On completion of the
authorization form a States Party agrees to
allow UNESCO to use photographic materials included as
part of the nomination, for promotional
activities.
see Nomination form
B
Balance
Balance is first referred to in Paragraph 6(iii) of
the Operational Guidelines with reference to efforts
to maintain a "reasonable balance between the numbers of
cultural heritage and the natural heritage properties"
included in the World Heritage List. This statement
is reaffirmed in Paragraph 15 of the Operational
Guidelines (UNESCO February 1996: 2, 3 and 5) and is in
conformity with the spirit of the Convention as an
instrument for the conservation of both the natural and the
cultural heritage.
In the section of the Operational Guidelines concerned
with the granting of international assistance,
Paragraph 111 states that a "balance will be maintained
between funds allocated to projects for the preservation of
the cultural heritage on the one hand and projects for the
conservation of the natural heritage on the other hand"
(UNESCO February 1996: 38).
Section VI of the Operational Guidelines is entitled
"Balance between the Cultural and the Natural Heritage in the
Implementation of the Convention" (UNESCO February 1996: 40-
41). Paragraph 121 outlines a number of measures recommended
by the Committee to achieve this balance
(UNESCO February 1996: 40-41).
The balance between the numbers of natural and
cultural properties inscribed in the World
Heritage List was the subject of discussion at the March
1996 "Expert Meeting on Evaluation of general principles and
criteria for nominations of natural World Heritage sites"
(UNESCO 15 April 1996). The report of the Expert Meeting
notes that ""balance" is not about numbers, but about
representativity for biogeographical regions or events in the
history of life" (UNESCO 15 April 1996: 6). The World
Heritage Bureau and Committee will consider the substance of
the report of the Expert Meeting at their twentieth sessions
in 1996.
Biogeographic(al) provinces
In the Operational Guidelines, biogeographic(al)
provinces are suggested as an appropriate comparative
unit for grouping similar natural properties when
preparing tentative lists (Paragraph 8), for
nominating a series of natural properties for
nomination to the World Heritage List
(Paragraph 19(iii)) and for IUCN when preparing
relative evaluations of natural properties
(Paragraph 60) (UNESCO February 1996: 6 and 18).
Buffer zone
Paragraph 17 of the Operational Guidelines defines a
buffer zone as:
... an area surrounding the property which has
restrictions placed on its use to give an added layer of
protection; the area constituting the buffer zone should
be determined in each case through technical studies
(UNESCO February 1996: 5).
Paragraph 17 of the Operational Guidelines further
states that:
Whenever necessary for the proper conservation of a
cultural or natural property nominated, an adequate
"buffer zone" around a property should be provided and
should be afforded the necessary protection ... Details
on the size, characteristics and authorized uses of a
buffer zone, as well as a map indicating its precise
boundaries, should be provided in the nomination file
relating to the property in question (UNESCO February
1996: 5).
Bureau
see World Heritage Bureau
C
Canal
In September 1994 a meeting on "Heritage Canals" was held at
Chaffeys Lock, Ontario, Canada. The expert meeting defined a
canal as:
... a human-engineered waterway. It may be of
outstanding universal value from the point of view of
history or technology, either intrinsically or as an
exceptional example representative of this category of
cultural property. The canal may be a monumental work,
the defining features of a linear cultural landscape, or
an integral component of a complex cultural landscape
(von Droste et al 1995: 433, Annex III).
see Cultural landscape
Centre
see UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Secretariat
Clearly defined landscape
Clearly defined landscape is one of the three main
categories of cultural landscapes adopted by the
World Heritage Committee at its sixteenth session in
December 1992 (UNESCO 14 December 1992: 54-55) and included
in the Operational Guidelines (UNESCO February 1996:
11, Paragraph 39).
Paragraph 39 (i) of the Operational Guidelines refers
to clearly defined landscapes in the following way:
39.
(i) The most easily identifiable is the clearly defined
landscape designed and created intentionally by man.
This embraces garden and parkland landscapes constructed
for aesthetic reasons which are often (but not always)
associated with religious or other monumental buildings
and ensembles (UNESCO February 1996: 11).
CNPPA
The CNPPA (Commission on National Parks and Protected
Areas) is one of the six voluntary Commissions of
IUCN - The World Conservation Union. The
CNPPA is the largest worldwide network of protected
area managers and specialists. The CNPPA mission is
to promote the establishment and effective management of a
worldwide network of terrestrial and marine protected areas.
see IUCN, IUCN evaluation
Commission on National Parks and Protected Areas (CNPPA)
see CNPPA
Committee
see World Heritage Committee
Comparative assessments
In stating that properties included in the World Heritage
List should be carefully selected, Paragraph 9 of the
Operational Guidelines further comments that
"comparative assessments for the harmonization of tentative
lists and nominations of cultural properties" should be
performed (UNESCO February 1996: 4).
see Comparative evaluations, Tentative list,
Harmonization
Comparative evaluations
Paragraph 12 of the Operational Guidelines refers to
the requirement when nominating cultural properties
belonging to "certain well-represented categories" to prepare
"a comparative evaluation of the property in relation to
other properties of a similar type" (UNESCO February 1996: 5).
In presenting "Guidelines for the evaluation and examination
of nominations" the Operational Guidelines state that
"ICOMOS is requested to make comparative evaluations of
properties belonging to the same type of cultural property"
(UNESCO February 1996: 18-19, Paragraph 61(c)). The
Operational Guidelines do not contain a similar
requirement for IUCN in evaluating natural properties.
see Comparative assessments, Tentative list,
Harmonization
Conditions of authenticity
see Authenticity
Conservation
The World Heritage Convention does not specifically
define conservation. Throughout the Convention
reference is made to the "identification, protection,
conservation, presentation and transmission to future
generations of the cultural and natural heritage". Article 5
of the Convention makes reference to a number of
"effective and active measures" that can be taken by
States Parties in ensuring this "identification,
protection, conservation, presentation and transmission"
(UNESCO 1972).
The Operational Guidelines do not include a definition
of conservation. The Operational Guidelines
state that one of the four essential functions of the
World Heritage Committee is to "monitor the state of
conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage
List" (UNESCO February 1996: 2, Paragraph 3 (ii)).
Guidelines for monitoring the "state of conservation"
of properties inscribed in the World Heritage List
feature prominently in the Operational Guidelines
(UNESCO February 1996: Section II). The term
preservation and conservation are used
interchangeably to refer to the "State of
preservation/conservation" section of the nomination
form (UNESCO February 1996: 20, Paragraph 64 (d)).
Paragraph 24 (b) (ii) of the Operational Guidelines
stipulates that cultural properties included in
the World Heritage List must "have adequate legal
and/or contractual and/or traditional protection and
management mechanisms to ensure the conservation of the
nominated cultural properties or cultural landscapes" (UNESCO
February 1996: 7-8).
The Operational Guidelines also include reference,
without definition, to "conservation policy" (Paragraph 27
(ii)), "conservation scheme" (Paragraph 34), "preventive
conservation" (Paragraph 69) and "day-to-day conservation"
(Paragraph 70) (UNESCO February 1996: 8, 10 and 26).
Conservation is used interchangeably with
preservation, safeguarding and protection
in the Operational Guidelines.
The Nara Document on Authenticity defines
conservation, specifically with reference to the
cultural heritage, as:
Conservation: all efforts designed to understand
cultural heritage, know its history and meaning, ensure
its material safeguard and, as required, its
presentation, restoration and enhancement (Larson 1995:
xxv).
The French definition of Conservation is also included
in Larson (1995: xxxi).
see Preservation, Protection,
Safeguarding, State of conservation
Convention
see Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural
and natural heritage
Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural
and natural heritage
The Convention concerning the protection of the world
cultural and natural heritage was adopted by the General
Conference of UNESCO at its seventeenth session in Paris on
16 November 1972 (UNESCO 1972). The Convention, with
146 signatory States Parties as of June 1996, is the
most successful international heritage conservation
instrument in the world. The Convention responds to
the increasing threats to cultural heritage and
natural heritage caused by poverty in many countries,
neglect, and in some countries, by unconsidered economic
growth and development and seeks to encourage States
Parties to identify, protect, preserve and present
cultural heritage and natural heritage for
future generations in a spirit of international cooperation.
As the first step in the World Heritage conservation
process, cultural properties and natural properties
of outstanding universal value are identified
and included on the World Heritage List. The
World Heritage Committee has inscribed 469 properties
on the World Heritage List. The Convention
also establishes a World Heritage Fund from which
assistance is available for the identification and
conservation of the world's heritage.
Convention for the protection of the world cultural and
natural heritage
see Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural
and natural heritage
Corrective measures
Corrective measures are referred to in Paragraphs 22,
46, 47, 82 and 83 of the Operational Guidelines
without specific definition (UNESCO February 1996: 6, 15
and 30).
In Paragraph 22 an "action plan outlining corrective
measures" is required when a State Party nominates a
property that meets the criteria and the
conditions of authenticity and/or integrity but
which is threatened by human action. Similar reference is
made in Paragraphs 46 and 47 (UNESCO February 1996: 6 and
15).
Paragraphs 82 and 83 of the Operational Guidelines
refer to the development of "a programme of corrective
measures" in the section on the "Procedure for the inclusion
of properties in the List of World Heritage in Danger"
(UNESCO February 1996: 30).
Criteria
Paragraphs 2 and 5 of Article 11 of the Convention
refer to the definition and establishment of criteria
on the basis of which a property belonging to the
cultural or natural heritage may be included in
the World Heritage List and/or the List of World
Heritage in Danger, by the World Heritage
Committee (UNESCO 1972).
In accordance with Article 11 of the Convention, the
World Heritage Committee have established
criteria for the inclusion of cultural properties
and natural properties in the World Heritage
List. The cultural heritage criteria with the
associated test of authenticity and requirements
concerning protection and management mechanisms are
included in Paragraph 24 of the Operational Guidelines
(UNESCO February 1996: 7-8). The natural heritage
criteria with the associated conditions of integrity
are included in Paragraph 43 of the Operational
Guidelines (UNESCO February 1996: 12-15).
In accordance with Article 11 of the Convention the
World Heritage Committee have established criteria
for the inclusion of cultural properties and
natural properties in the List of World Heritage in
Danger. The criteria for the inclusion of
cultural properties in the List of World Heritage
in Danger are included in Paragraph 78 of the
Operational Guidelines (UNESCO February 1996: 28).
The criteria for the inclusion of natural
properties in the List of World Heritage in Danger
are included in Paragraph 79 of the Operational
Guidelines (UNESCO February 1996: 28-29).
see Cultural heritage criteria, Natural heritage
criteria, List of World Heritage in Danger, World
Heritage List
Criterion
The singular for criteria.
see Criteria
Cultural heritage
Cultural heritage is defined in Article 1 of the
Convention as shown below:
Article 1
For the purpose of this Convention, the following
shall be considered as "cultural heritage":
monuments: architectural works, works of monumental
sculpture and painting, elements or structures of
an archaeological nature, inscriptions, cave
dwellings and combinations of features, which are
of outstanding universal value from the point of
view of history, art or science;
groups of buildings: groups of separate or
connected buildings which, because of their
architecture, their homogeneity or their place in
the landscape, are of outstanding universal value
from the point of view of history, art or science;
sites: works of man or the combined works of nature
and man, and areas including archaeological sites
which are of outstanding universal value from the
historical, aesthetic, ethnological or
anthropological point of view (UNESCO 1972).
Cultural heritage criteria
A cultural property may be inscribed in the
World Heritage List if it meets one or more of the
cultural heritage criteria, the test of
authenticity and requirements concerning protection
and management mechanisms presented in Paragraph 24 of
the Operational Guidelines (UNESCO February 1996: 7-
8).
see Criteria, Natural heritage criteria,
Protection and management mechanisms, Test of
authenticity, Integrity
Cultural landscapes
At its sixteenth session in December 1992 the World
Heritage Committee adopted three main categories of
cultural landscapes (UNESCO 14 December 1992: 54-55)
and included guidelines concerning their inclusion in the
World Heritage List in the Operational
Guidelines (UNESCO February 1996: 10-12, Paragraphs 35 to
42).
Paragraphs 36 to 38 of the Operational Guidelines
provide some definition of cultural landscapes.
36. Cultural landscapes represent the "combined
works of nature and of man" designated in Article 1 of
the Convention. They are illustrative of the evolution
of human society and settlement over time, under the
influence of the physical constraints and/or
opportunities presented by their natural environment and
of successive social, economic and cultural forces, both
external and internal. They should be selected on the
basis both of their outstanding universal value and of
their representativity in terms of a clearly defined
geo-cultural region and also for their capacity to
illustrate the essential and distinct cultural elements
of such regions.
37. The term "cultural landscape" embraces a
diversity of manifestations of the interaction between
humankind and its natural environment.
38. Cultural landscapes often reflect
specific techniques of sustainable land-use, considering
the characteristics and limits of the natural
environment they are established in, and a specific
spiritual relation to nature. Protection of cultural
landscapes can contribute to modern techniques of
sustainable land-use and can maintain or enhance natural
values in the landscape. The continued existence of
traditional forms of land-use supports biological
diversity in many regions of the world. The protection
of traditional cultural landscapes is therefore helpful
in maintaining biological diversity (UNESCO February
1996: 10-11).
Paragraph 39 of the Operational Guidelines refers to
cultural landscapes as falling into three main
categories - the clearly defined landscape, the
organically evolved landscape (including relict (or
fossil) landscapes and continuing landscapes) and
associative cultural landscapes (UNESCO February 1996:
11).
Paragraphs 40 to 42 of the Operational Guidelines
provide some further guidance concerning the inclusion of
cultural landscapes in the World Heritage List
(UNESCO February 1996: 11-12).
Since 1992 several regional and thematic meetings on the
subject of cultural landscapes of outstanding
universal value have been held (see for example, von
Droste et al 1995, von Droste et al 1995:
Annexes II to VI and UNESCO 21 April 1996).
see Associative cultural landscape, Canal,
Clearly defined landscape, Continuing landscape,
Heritage route, Organically evolved landscape,
Relict (or fossil) landscape
Cultural property
Properties inscribed in the World Heritage List after
having met at least one of the cultural heritage criteria
and the test of authenticity are referred to as
cultural properties.
see Cultural heritage, Mixed property, Natural
property, Property
D
Data sheets
Standardised data sheets for each natural property
nomination are prepared by IUCN using the
information held by the Protected Area Data Unit of the
World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC).
These data sheets are used as the basis for
monitoring natural properties (IUCN 1995: 3).
Deferral
see Deferred
Deferred
When the Bureau and Committee examine
nominations of properties for inclusion in the
World Heritage List they classify their decisions into
those they choose to inscribe, those they decide not to
inscribe, those referred back to States Parties for
further information, and those whose consideration is
deferred (UNESCO February 1996: 23-25, Paragraph 65).
The inscription of a property in the World
Heritage List is deferred when the
Committee awaits "evidence of the full commitment of
the nominating government" to protect the property
(UNESCO February 1996: 3, Paragraph 6 (v)).
Paragraph 32 of the Operational Guidelines recommends
that examination of nominations of "new towns of the
twentieth century" should be deferred pending the
passage of time (UNESCO February 1996: 10).
The Bureau and Committee may defer the
examination of a property for inclusion in the
World Heritage List pending the completion of an "in-
depth assessment or study" (UNESCO February 1996: 24,
Paragraph 65 June/July (d)).
Deletion
Deletion of a property from the World
Heritage List refers to the same process as
delisting.
A property may be deleted or removed from the
List of World Heritage in Danger when that
property is no longer under threat (UNESCO February
1996: 31, Paragraph 89).
A property may be deleted from both the List
of World Heritage in Danger and the World Heritage
List if the property has deteriorated to the
extent that it has lost those characteristics which
determined its inclusion in the World Heritage List
(UNESCO February 1996: 31, Paragraph 89).
The Operational Guidelines outline a procedure
concerning the possible deletion of a property from
the World Heritage List in Paragraphs 46 to 54 (UNESCO
February 1996: 15-17).
see Delisting
Delisting
Delisting a property from the World Heritage
List refers to the same process as deletion.
Paragraph 22 of the Operational Guidelines comments
that the Committee will consider delisting a
property when the corrective measures agreed to
by the State Party nominating a property for
inclusion in the World Heritage List are not submitted
"within the time proposed by the State" (UNESCO February
1996: 6).
see Deletion
Designed landscape
see Clearly defined landscape
E
Emblem
see World Heritage emblem
Emergency assistance
Emergency assistance is one of the types of
international assistance available under the
provisions of the World Heritage Fund.
States Parties may request emergency assistance
"for work in connection with cultural and natural
properties included or suitable for inclusion in the World
Heritage List and which have suffered severe damage due to
sudden, unexpected phenomena" (UNESCO February 1996: 32,
Paragraph 92).
Requests for emergency assistance should be submitted
to the UNESCO World Heritage Centre on form WHC/5
(UNESCO 1990d).
see International assistance, World Heritage Fund
Evaluation
Section F of the Operational Guidelines establishes
"Guidelines for the evaluation and examination of
nominations" (UNESCO February 1996: 18-19). At the beginning
of Section F, Paragraph 57 states that:
The evaluation of whether or not individual sites
nominated by States Parties satisfy the criteria and the
conditions of authenticity/integrity will be carried out
by the International Council on Monuments and Sites
(ICOMOS) for cultural properties and by the World
Conservation Union (IUCN) for natural properties. In
the case of nominations of cultural properties in the
category of 'cultural landscapes', as appropriate, the
evaluation will be carried out in consultation with the
World Conservation Union (IUCN) (UNESCO February 1996:
18).
Paragraphs 57 to 63 of the Operational Guidelines
provide further guidance as to the preparation of
technical evaluations by ICOMOS and IUCN
(UNESCO February 1996: 18-19).
Section H of the Operational Guidelines in outlining
the "Procedure and timetable for the processing of
nominations", refers to the timing of the preparation of
evaluations by IUCN and ICOMOS and to
their examination by the World Heritage Committee and
its Bureau (UNESCO February 1996: 23-25).
see also Comparative evaluation, ICOMOS evaluation, IUCN
evaluation, Timetable
F
Fossil landscape
see Relict (or fossil) landscape
Fund
see World Heritage Fund
Fund for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural
Heritage
see World Heritage Fund
G
Geological and physiographical formations
Geological and physiographical formations are
referred to as part of the definition of natural
heritage in Article 2 of the Convention (UNESCO
1972).
see Natural heritage
General Assembly of States Parties to the Convention
The General Assembly of States Parties to the
Convention meets during the General Conference of
UNESCO, that is, every two years.
Global Strategy for the Implementation of the World Heritage
Convention
see Global Strategy
Global Strategy
The Global Strategy is a conceptual framework devised
to ensure the representativeness and credibility of the
World Heritage List. The Global Strategy was
adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its
eighteenth session in 1994 (UNESCO 13 October 1994).
The Global Strategy was originally devised with
particular reference to cultural heritage. In March
1996 a group of experts meeting in the Parc National de la
Vanoise, France, affirmed the application of the Global
Strategy for natural heritage (UNESCO 15 April
1996). The World Heritage Bureau and Committee will consider
the substance of the report of the group of experts at their
twentieth sessions in 1996.
The regional and thematic meetings held on the subject of
cultural landscapes of outstanding universal value
(see for example, von Droste et al 1995, von
Droste et al 1995: Annexes 11 to VI and UNESCO 21
April 1996) and meetings on authenticity (Larson and
Marstein 1994, Larson 1995 and Inter-American Symposium on
Authenticity, March 1996) are all important contributions to
the aims of the Global Strategy.
The first subregional meeting on the Global Strategy was held
in Harare, Zimbabwe from 11 to 13 October 1995 (UNESCO 31
January 1996: 53-54).
Groups of buildings
Groups of buildings are referred to as part of the
definition of cultural heritage in Article 1 of the
Convention (UNESCO 1972).
see Cultural heritage
Groups of urban buildings
The World Heritage Committee has adopted guidelines
concerning the inclusion of groups of urban
buildings in the World Heritage List (UNESCO
February 1996: 8-10, Paragraphs 26-34).
Paragraph 27 of the Operational Guidelines refers to
groups of urban buildings as falling into three main
categories - the towns which are no longer inhabited but
which provide unchanged archaeological evidence of the past,
historic towns which are still inhabited (inhabited
historic towns) and new towns of the twentieth century
(UNESCO February 1996: 8).
Groups of urban buildings are not specifically referred
to in the Convention.
see Inhabited historic towns
Guidelines
see Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World
Heritage Convention
H
Harmonization
To ensure the careful selection of properties for
inclusion in the World Heritage List the Committee
has recommended the harmonization of tentative
lists and of cultural properties for geo-cultural
regions or areas (UNESCO February 1996: 4 and 31, Paragraph 9
and Paragraph 90).
Harmonization is not mentioned in the Operational
Guidelines with reference to natural properties or
their inclusion on tentative lists.
Harmonization is not referred to in the
Convention.
Heritage route
In November 1994 a meeting on "Routes as Part of Our Cultural
Heritage" was held in Madrid, Spain. The expert meeting
defined a heritage route as:
... composed of tangible elements of which the cultural
significance comes from exchanges and a multi-
dimensional dialogue across countries or regions, and
that illustrate the interaction of movement, along the
route, in space and time (von Droste et al 1995:
437, Annex IV).
see Cultural landscape
Historic towns
see Groups of urban buildings, Inhabited historic
towns
I
ICCROM (International Centre for the Study of the
Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (Rome
Centre)
ICCROM was created by UNESCO in 1956.
ICCROM was formerly known as the Rome Centre.
In 1977 the name was changed to ICCROM (the initials of the
International Centre for Conservation, and given that the
Centre is located in Rome, ROM, ICC+ROM=ICCROM).
Article 8 (3) of the Convention requires that a
representative of the Rome Centre (ICCROM)
attend meetings of the Committee in an advisory
capacity (UNESCO 1972).
ICCROM is an intergovernmental body which provides
expert advice on how to conserve properties inscribed in the
World Heritage List, as well as training in
conservation techniques. ICCROM is an active partner
in the World Heritage Information Network (WHIN).
see World Heritage Information Network (WHIN)
ICOMOS ( International Council of Monuments and
Sites)
Article 8 (3) of the Convention requires that a
representative of ICOMOS attend meetings of the
Committee in an advisory capacity (UNESCO 1972).
ICOMOS provides evaluations on cultural properties
nominated for inscription in the World Heritage
List. ICOMOS is an international, non-
governmental organization, founded in 1965, with an
international secretariat in Paris, France. ICOMOS is
one of the main participants in the World Heritage
Information Network (WHIN).
see World Heritage Information Network (WHIN)
ICOMOS evaluation
The evaluation procedures used by ICOMOS for
cultural property nominations are set out in the
ICOMOS volume on "Evaluation of Cultural Properties"
presented by ICOMOS to the World Heritage Bureau
and Committee each year (see for example ICOMOS
1996).
see Evaluation and IUCN Evaluation
Identification
The World Heritage Convention does not specifically
define identification. Throughout the Convention
reference is made to the "identification, protection,
conservation, presentation and transmission to future
generations of the cultural and natural heritage". Article 5
of the Convention makes reference to a number of
"effective and active measures" that can be taken by
States Parties in ensuring this "identification,
protection, conservation, presentation and transmission"
(UNESCO 1972).
Within the Operational Guidelines the
identification of properties for potential
inclusion in the World Heritage List is
referred to as the first step in the process of World
Heritage conservation (UNESCO February 1996: 1, 17 and
32, Paragraphs 2, 54 and 94).
An identification section is included as part of the
nomination form (UNESCO February 1996: 20, Paragraph
64 (c) and UNESCO 1995).
Identification number
The identification number, abbreviated to ID
No, is an accession number given to each property
for which a completed nomination form is received
in the World Heritage Centre.
ID No
see Identification number
Implementation
Implementation refers to the act of putting the
Convention into practice.
Immovable property
Immovable property is property that cannot
easily be moved. The opposite of immovable property
is movable property. As the Convention
does not consider nominations of immovable
property "which are likely to become movable" (UNESCO
February 1996: 8, Paragraph 25).
see Movable property
Indicative list
The term indicative list is sometimes used to refer to
the inventory of property mentioned in Article 11(1)
of the Convention. In the French language version of
the Operational Guidelines, the "Orientations devant
guider las mise en oeuvre de al Convention du patrimoine
mondial", "une liste indicative" is used to refer to this
inventory of property. Despite this the English
language version of the Operational Guidelines refers
to tentative list and not to indicative list.
see Inventory of property, Tentative list
Information sources
The Nara Document on Authenticity defines
information sources as:
Information sources: all material, written, oral
and figurative sources which make it possible to know
the nature, specifications, meaning and history of the
cultural heritage (Larson 1995: xxv).
The French definition of Sources d'information is also
included in Larson (1995: xxxi).
Inhabited historic towns
Paragraph 29 of the Operational Guidelines provides
some definition of inhabited historic towns as:
(i) Towns which are typical of a specific period or
culture, which have been almost wholly preserved
and which have remained largely unaffected by
subsequent developments. Here the property to be
listed is the entire town together with its
surroundings, which must also be protected;
(ii) Towns that have evolved along characteristic lines
and have preserved, sometimes in the midst of
exceptional natural surroundings, spatial
arrangements and structures that are typical of the
successive stages in their history. Here the
clearly defined historic part takes precedence over
the contemporary environment;
(iii) "Historic centres" that cover exactly the same
area as ancient towns and are now enclosed
within modern cities. Here it is necessary to
determine the precise limits of the property
in its widest historical dimensions and to
make appropriate provision for its immediate
surroundings;
(iv) Sectors, areas or isolated units which, even in the
residual state in which they have survived, provide
coherent evidence of the character of a historic
town which has disappeared. In such cases surviving
areas and buildings should bear sufficient
testimony to the former whole (UNESCO February
1996: 9).
see Groups of urban buildings
Inscription
Inscription refers to the act of including or
inscribing a property in the World Heritage
List.
Integrity
Also known as Conditions of integrity.
The concept of integrity is not referred to directly
in the World Heritage Convention.
Paragraph 44 of the Operational Guidelines requires
that a natural property nominated for inclusion in the
World Heritage List be considered for inclusion only
if it meets one or more of the natural heritage criteria
and fulfils the conditions of integrity
(UNESCO February 1996: 12). This requirement is again
referred to in Paragraph 45 of the Operational
Guidelines (UNESCO February 1996: 15).
The conditions of integrity may be summarised from
Paragraph 44 (b) (i) to (iv) of the Operational
Guidelines as follows:
44.
...
(b) ...
(i) The sites described in 44(a)(i) should contain
all or most of the key interrelated and
interdependent elements in their natural
relationships ...
(ii) The sites described in 44(a)(ii) should have
sufficient size and contain the necessary
elements to demonstrate the key aspects of
processes that are essential for the long-term
conservation of the ecosystems and the
biological diversity they contain ...
(iii) The sites described in 44(a)(iii) should
be of outstanding aesthetic value and
include areas that are essential for
maintaining the beauty of the site ...
(iv) The sites described in paragraph 44(a)(iv)
should contain habitats for maintaining the
most diverse fauna and flora characteristic of
the biogeographic province and ecosystems
under consideration ...
(UNESCO February 1996: 13-14).
Paragraphs 57 and 58 of the Operational Guidelines
state that natural properties nominated for
inclusion in the World Heritage List should satisfy
the conditions of integrity and that the determination
as to whether these conditions are met will be carried out by
IUCN (UNESCO February 1996: 18). Furthermore,
Paragraph 58 (d) of the Operational Guidelines also
requests that IUCN in examining and evaluating
nominations, "make comments and recommendations on the
integrity and future management of each property recommended
by the Bureau, during its presentation to the Committee"
(UNESCO February 1996: 19).
The Operational Guidelines refer to the threat to the
integrity of natural properties as one of the
criterion for the inclusion of natural properties
in the List of World Heritage in Danger (UNESCO
February 1996: 29, Paragraph 79 (i) (c)). Paragraph 80 of
the Operational Guidelines makes comments concerning
how threats to the integrity of natural properties
may be "amenable to correction by human action" or by
"administrative or legislative action, such as the cancelling
of a major public works project or the improvement of legal
status" (UNESCO February 1996: 29).
On only one occasion the concept of integrity is
referred to with reference to the conservation of
cultural properties. In Paragraph 24 (b)(ii) of the
Operational Guidelines reference is made to the need
to "preserve the integrity of cultural sites" (UNESCO
February 1996: 8).
The possibility of applying conditions of integrity to
both natural heritage and cultural heritage,
"and thus of applying one common approach for the
identification and evaluation of World Heritage" was the
subject of discussion at the March 1996 "Expert Meeting on
Evaluation of general principles and criteria for nominations
of natural World Heritage sites" (UNESCO 15 April 1996). The
World Heritage Bureau and Committee will
consider the substance of the report of the Expert Meeting at
their twentieth sessions in 1996.
Intergovernmental Committee for the Protection of the World
Cultural and Natural Heritage
see World Heritage Committee
International assistance
The granting of collective assistance, such as
international assistance, through the participation of
the international community is one of the fundamental
conservation tools established by the Convention and
is referred to in the Preamble to the Convention
UNESCO 1972).
The Convention includes significant detail concerning
the provision of international assistance - see for
example Article 13, and Section V "Conditions and
Arrangements for International Assistance, Articles 19-26
(UNESCO 1972). The Convention states that
international assistance may be used to identify,
"secure the protection, conservation, presentation or
rehabilitation" of a cultural or natural property
(UNESCO 1972: Article 13 (1) and (2)).
Section IV of the Operational Guidelines entitled
"International Assistance" describes the various forms of
assistance available under the World Heritage Fund
(Preparatory assistance, Emergency
assistance, Training, Technical co-operation
and assistance for promotional activities),
establishes the deadlines for the presentation of requests
for international assistance for consideration by the
World Heritage Committee and its Bureau,
establishes an order of priorities for the granting of
international assistance, details of the agreement to
be concluded with States Parties receiving
international assistance, and the implementation of
projects and conditions for the granting of international
assistance (UNESCO February 1996: 31-39, Paragraphs 90 to
117).
see Emergency assistance, Preparatory assistance,
Promotional activities, Technical assistance,
Technical co-operation, Training, World Heritage Fund
International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and
Restoration of Cultural Property (Rome Centre)
see ICCROM
International Council of Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS)
see ICOMOS
International Union for the Conservation of Nature and
Natural Resources (IUCN)
[now the World Conservation Union]
see IUCN
International protection
Article 7 of the Convention provides some definition
of the concept of international protection when it
states that:
For the purpose of this Convention, international
protection of the world cultural and natural heritage
shall be understood to mean the establishment of a
system of international co-operation and assistance
designed to support States Parties to the Convention in
their efforts to conserve and identify that heritage
(UNESCO 1972).
see National protection
Inventory of property
Article 11(1) of the Convention establishes the
requirement for States Parties to prepare an
inventory of property for submission to the World
Heritage Committee.
Article 11
1. Every State Party to this Convention shall, in so
far as possible, submit to the World Heritage
Committee an inventory of property forming part of
the cultural and natural heritage, situated in its
territory and suitable for inclusion in the list
provided for in paragraph 2 of this Article [the
World Heritage List]. This inventory, which
shall not be considered exhaustive, shall include
documentation about the location of the property in
question and its significance (UNESCO 1972).
This inventory is referred to in the Operational
Guidelines as a tentative list.
see Indicative list, Tentative list
IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature and
Natural Resources) - The World Conservation Union
Founded in 1948, the IUCN - The World Conservation
Union brings together States, government agencies and a
diverse range of non-governmental organisations in a world
partnership. The IUCN is an international, non-
governmental organization with more than 800 members from 125
countries. The IUCN seeks to ensure the
conservation of the integrity and diversity of
nature and to ensure that any use of natural resources is
equitable and ecologically sustainable.
Article 8 (3) of the Convention requires that a
representative of IUCN attend meetings of the
Committee in an advisory capacity (UNESCO 1972).
The IUCN advises the World Heritage Committee
on the selection of natural properties for
inclusion in the World Heritage List, and through its
worldwide network of specialists, reports back on the
state of conservation of inscribed properties.
see IUCN evaluation
IUCN evaluation
The evaluation procedures used by IUCN for
natural property nominations are set out in the
IUCN volume on "Documentation on World Heritage
Properties (Natural)" presented by IUCN to the
World Heritage Committee each year (see for example
IUCN 1995). The evaluation or "Technical Review" of
natural properties for inclusion in the
World Heritage List is conducted by the Natural
Heritage Programme (NHP) of IUCN in association with
the IUCN's Commission on National Parks and Protected
Areas (CNPPA). The IUCN uses a standard
format in presenting its documentation on natural property
nominations. The documentation provided by IUCN
is in three parts - a summary of the original nomination
including supplementary information, an evaluation
and recommendation and data sheets (IUCN 1995: 3).
see Evaluation, ICOMOS evaluation
Itineraries
see Heritage route
J
Joint nomination
Paragraphs 16 and 20 of the Operational Guidelines
make reference to the submission of joint nominations
of a property or series of properties when that
property or series of properties extends across
the national territorial borders of one State Party
into the territory of another States Party (UNESCO
February 1996: 5 and 6).
Examples of joint nominations include:
Argentina and Brazil
Jesuit Missions of the Guaranis
Belarus and Poland
Bialowieza Forest
Canada and the United States of America
Tatshenshini-Alsek/Kluane National
Park/Wrangell-St. Elias National Park
and Reserve and Glacier Bay National Park
Canada and the United States of America
Waterton Glacier International Peace Park
Guinea and Cote d'Ivoire
Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve
Hungary and Slovak Republic
Caves of the Aggtelek and Slovak Karst
A complete list of joint nominations is included in
the World Heritage List, published annually (see
UNESCO-ICOMOS Documentation Centre January 1996).
Justification
Section G of the Operational Guidelines entitled
"Format and content of nominations" provides guidance as to
how States Parties should justify the inclusion of
properties in the World Heritage List.
Information should be provided under three separate
headings as follows: (i) the reasons for which the
property is considered to meet one or more of the
criteria set out under paragraphs 24 and 44 above; (ii)
an evaluation of the property's present state of
preservation as compared with similar properties
elsewhere; (iii) indications as to the authenticity of
the property (UNESCO February 1996: 20, Paragraph 64
(e)).
The nomination form includes specific requirements for
justifying cultural and/or natural property
nominations.
Nominations of properties for inclusion in the
World Heritage List, should be well justified and
presented "in the form of a well-argued case" making
reference to the natural and/or cultural heritage
criteria they meet (UNESCO February 1996: 4, Paragraph
10).
L
List
see List of World Heritage in Danger, World Heritage List
List of World Heritage in Danger
The List of World Heritage in Danger is clearly
defined in Article 11 (4) of the Convention:
1. ... a list of the property appearing in the World
Heritage List for the conservation of which major
operations are necessary and for which assistance
has been requested under the Convention. This list
shall contain an estimate of the cost of such
operations. The list may include only such
property forming part of the cultural and natural
heritage as is threatened by serious and specific
dangers, such as the threat of disappearance caused
by accelerated deterioration, large-scale public or
private projects or rapid urban or tourist
development projects: destruction caused by changes
in the use or ownership of the land; major
alterations due to unknown causes; abandonment for
any reason whatsoever; the outbreak or the threat
of an armed conflict; calamities and cataclysms;
serious fires, earthquakes, landslides; volcanic
eruptions; changes in water level, floods, and
tidal waves. The Committee may at any time, in
case of urgent need, make a new entry in the List
of World Heritage in Danger and publicize such
entry immediately (UNESCO 1972).
Paragraph 6(vi) of the Operational Guidelines states
that,
(i) When a property has deteriorated to the extent that
it has lost those characteristics which determined
its inclusion in the World Heritage List. It should
be placed on the World Heritage in Danger List,
subsequently the procedure concerning the possible
deletion from the List will be applied (UNESCO
February 1996: 3).
There are currently 18 properties included in the
List of World Heritage in Danger.
see Deletion, Delisting
M
Management
Paragraph 63 of the Operational Guidelines clearly
states that the characteristics or values which
justified the inclusion of a property in the
World Heritage List should be reflected in its future
management (UNESCO February 1996: 19).
Management plan
States Parties to the Convention are encouraged
to prepare management plans for the management
of each cultural and natural property nominated
for inclusion in the World Heritage List
(UNESCO February 1996: 6, Paragraph 21). This requirement is
reflected in the conditions of integrity for
natural properties (UNESCO February 1996: 14-15,
Paragraphs 44 (b)(v) and (vi)) and in the requirements
concerning protection and management mechanisms for
cultural properties (UNESCO February 1996: 7-8,
Paragraph 24 (b)(ii)).
Mixed property
17 properties are currently included in the World
Heritage List on the basis of both their natural and
cultural values (UNESCO-ICOMOS Documentation Centre 1996).
Although these types of World Heritage properties are
generally known as mixed properties, the
Operational Guidelines does not use, refer to, or
define this term. The Operational Guidelines do
however state that "States Parties should as far as possible
endeavour to include in their submissions properties which
derive their outstanding universal value from a particularly
significant combination of cultural and natural features"
(UNESCO February 1996: 5, Paragraph 18).
Mixed site
see Mixed property
Monitoring
One of the essential functions of the World Heritage
Committee is to monitor the state of
conservation of properties inscribed in the
World Heritage List. Section II of the Operational
Guidelines describes systematic monitoring and
reporting and reactive monitoring (UNESCO February
1996: 26-27).
Paragraphs 69 to 74 of the Operational Guidelines
described the process of systematic monitoring whilst
Paragraph 75 describes reactive monitoring (UNESCO
February 1996: 26-27).
see Reactive monitoring, Systematic monitoring and reporting
Monuments
Monuments are referred to as part of the definition of
cultural heritage in Article 1 of the
Convention (UNESCO 1972).
see Cultural heritage
Movable property
Movable property is property that can easily be
moved from one location to the other. As explained in the
Operational Guidelines, the World Heritage
Committee does not consider nominations of
movable property for inclusion in the World
Heritage List (UNESCO February 1996: 8, Paragraph 25).
see Immovable property
N
Nara Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World
Heritage Convention
see Authenticity
Nara Document on Authenticity
see Authenticity
National protection
The Convention refers to national "identification,
protection, conservation, presentation and transmission to
future generations of the cultural and natural heritage"
situated on its territory as national protection.
National protection is distinct from international
protection (UNESCO 1972: Articles 4-6). National
protection of cultural and natural heritage
is an essential component in the conservation of
World Heritage properties.
see International protection
Natural
see Natural area
Natural area
The "Report of the Expert Meeting on Evaluation of general
principles and criteria for nominations of natural World
Heritage sites" held at the Parc national de la Vanoise,
France on 22 to 24 March 1996 (UNESCO 15 April 1996) includes
the following definition of natural area:
A natural area is one where bio-physical processes and
landform features are still relatively intact and where
a primary management goal of the area is to ensure that
natural values are protected. The term "natural" is a
relative one. It is recognized that no area is totally
pristine and that all natural areas are in a dynamic
state. Human activities in natural areas often occur
and when sustainable may complement the natural values
of the area (UNESCO 15 April 1996: 3).
The World Heritage Bureau and Committee will
consider the substance of the report of the Expert Meeting at
their twentieth sessions in 1996.
Natural features
Natural features are referred to as part of the
definition of natural heritage in Article 2 of the
Convention (UNESCO 1972).
see Natural heritage
Natural heritage
Natural heritage is defined in Article 2 of the
Convention as shown below:
Article 2
For the purposes of this Convention, the following shall
be considered as "natural heritage";
natural features consisting of physical and biological
formations or groups of such formations, which are of
outstanding universal value from the aesthetic or
scientific point of view;
geological and physiographical formations and precisely
delineated areas which constitute the habitat of
threatened species of animals and plants of outstanding
universal value from the point of view of science or conservation;
natural sites or precisely delineated natural areas of
outstanding universal value from the point of view of
science, conservation or natural beauty (UNESCO
1972).
Natural heritage criteria
A natural property may be inscribed in the
World Heritage List if it meets one or more of the
natural heritage criteria and the conditions of
integrity presented in Paragraph 44 of the Operational
Guidelines (UNESCO February 1996: 12-15).
see Conditions of integrity, Criteria, Cultural
heritage criteria
Natural property
Properties inscribed in the World Heritage List
after having met at least one of the natural heritage
criteria and the conditions of integrity are
referred to as natural properties.
Natural sites
Natural sites are referred to as part of the
definition of natural heritage in Article 2 of the
Convention (UNESCO 1972).
see Natural heritage
Nomination
The process whereby a States Party, or States
Parties, to the Convention seeks to have a
property included in the World Heritage List is
called nomination.
A nomination of a property for inclusion in the
World Heritage List must be made by the national
government of a country that is a signatory to the World
Heritage Convention. The property nominated, must
be located on the territory of that State Party.
Substantial guidance concerning the preparation of a
nomination is provided in the Operational
Guidelines (UNESCO February 1996: 3- 6, Paragraphs 7-22)
and in the nomination form (UNESCO 1995).
see Nomination form
Nomination form
The application form to be used by States Parties when
nominating properties for inclusion in the World
Heritage List is referred to as the nomination form
(UNESCO 1995).
Blank copies of the nomination form (UNESCO 1995) are
available from the World Heritage Centre. The
nomination form is also available electronically via
the INTERNET at the following address
.
When nominating properties for inclusion in the
World Heritage List, States Parties are
requested to submit three copies of the completed
nomination form to their UNESCO National Commission
and/or Permanent Delegation who should then forward it to the
UNESCO World Heritage Centre (UNESCO 1995).
O
Operational Guidelines
see Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World
Heritage Convention
Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World
Heritage Convention
The Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the
World Heritage Convention, known also as the
Operational Guidelines or simply as the
Guidelines, were prepared by the World Heritage
Committee for the purpose of informing States
Parties to the Convention of the principles which
guide the work of the World Heritage Committee in
establishing the World Heritage List, the List of
World Heritage in Danger and in granting international
assistance under the World Heritage Fund (see
UNESCO February 1996: 1-2, Paragraph 4). The Operational
Guidelines provide guidance concerning the format and
content of nominations to the World Heritage List
and present the timetable for submission and
evaluation of the nominations. The
Operational Guidelines also provide details on other
questions, mainly of a procedural nature, which relate to the
implementation of the Convention. Most
importantly the Operational Guidelines present the
"Criteria for the inclusion of cultural properties in the
World Heritage List" and the "Criteria for the inclusion of
natural properties in the World Heritage List".
The Operational Guidelines have been prepared with the
intention of ensuring objective and scientific decision-
making on the part of the World Heritage Committee.
The first version of the Operational Guidelines were
adopted by the World Heritage Committee in 1977.
Since 1977 the Operational Guidelines have been
adjusted and expanded to reflect the subsequent decisions of
the Committee. Nine major revisions of the
Operational Guidelines had been produced and adopted
by the World Heritage Committee up until June 1996.
Organically evolved landscape
Organically evolved landscape is one of the three main
categories of cultural landscapes adopted by the
World Heritage Committee at its sixteenth session in
December 1992 (UNESCO 14 December 1992: 54-55) and included
in the Operational Guidelines (UNESCO February 1996:
11, Paragraph 39).
Paragraph 39 (ii) of the Operational Guidelines refers
to organically evolved landscapes in the following
way:
39.
(i) The second category is the organically evolved
landscape. This results from an initial social,
economic, administrative, and/or religious imperative
and has developed its present form by association
with and in response to its natural environment.
Such landscapes reflect that process of evolution in
their form and component features. They fall into
two sub-categories:
- a relict (or fossil) landscape is one in which an
evolutionary process came to an end at some time in
the past, either abruptly or over a period. Its
significant distinguishing features are, however,
still visible in material form.
- a continuing landscape is one which retains an
active social role in contemporary society closely
associated with the traditional way of life, and in
which the evolutionary process is still in
progress. At the same time it exhibits significant
material evidence of its evolution over time
(UNESCO February 1996: 11).
see Associative cultural landscape, Clearly defined
landscape, Continuing landscape, Cultural
landscape, Relict (or fossil) landscape
Organization of World Heritage Cities (OWHC)
The Organization of World Heritage Cities (OWHC) was
established in 1993 to develop a sense of solidarity and a
cooperative relationship between World Heritage cites
particularly in view of the implementation of the
Convention. The OWHC thus facilitates an
exchange of knowledge, management techniques and financial
resources for the purpose of protecting monuments and sites.
The OWHC is based on the idea that sites within
populated cities endure pressures of a different nature and
therefore may require a more dynamic style of management.
There are over one hundred World Heritage cities to
date.
Outstanding universal value
Outstanding universal value is referred to in several
places in the Convention and the Operational
Guidelines without specific definition. Parts of the
cultural and natural heritage, "because
of their exceptional qualities, can be considered to be of
outstanding universal value, and as such worthy of
special protection against the dangers which increasingly
threaten them" (UNESCO February 1996: 1, Paragraph 1).
Outstanding universal value is sometimes simply
referred to as World Heritage value.
At the "Expert Meeting on Evaluation of general principles
and criteria for nominations of natural World Heritage sites"
held at the Parc national de la Vanoise, France on 22 to 24
March 1996,
The expert group recalled that different interpretations
have been made of the term "outstanding universal
value" which is a key to the establishment of a
selective World Heritage List. In a number of cases the
term has been also interpreted as implying "best of
its kind". The expert group stressed that the
notion of outstanding universal value has been
constructed over time and may be interpreted as a
concept incorporating both uniqueness and
representativeness (UNESCO 15 April 1996: 1).
The World Heritage Bureau and Committee will
consider the substance of the report of the Expert Meeting at
their twentieth sessions in 1996.
OWHC
see Organization of World Heritage Cities
P
Precisely delineated [natural] areas
Precisely delineated [natural] areas are
referred to as part of the definition of natural heritage
in Article 2 of the Convention (UNESCO 1972).
see Natural heritage
Preparatory assistance
Preparatory assistance is one of the types of
international assistance available to States
Parties from the World Heritage Fund. Paragraphs
90 and 91 of the Operational Guidelines outline the
types of activities that may be funded by preparatory
assistance. The upper limit available as preparatory
assistance is US$15,000 (UNESCO February 1996: 31-32).
The form used to request preparatory assistance
(UNESCO 1990c) can be obtained from the World Heritage
Centre. The Request for Preparatory Assistance
form is also available electronically via the INTERNET at
the following address
.
see International assistance
Presentation
The World Heritage Convention does not specifically
define presentation. Throughout the Convention
reference is made to the "identification, protection,
conservation, presentation and transmission to future
generations of the cultural and natural heritage". Article 5
of the Convention makes reference to a number of
"effective and active measures" that can be taken by
States Parties in ensuring this "identification,
protection, conservation, presentation and transmission"
(UNESCO 1972).
Although presentation is used very frequently in the
Operational Guidelines it is not defined.
Preservation
The World Heritage Convention and the Operational
Guidelines do not specifically define
preservation.
Preservation is used interchangeably with
conservation, safeguarding and protection
in the Operational Guidelines.
see Conservation, Protection, Safeguarding
Promotional activities
Promotional activities relating to World Heritage
conservation may include meetings organised to create
interest and greater awareness of the Convention, the
exchange of experiences and the preparation of information
material relating to the implementation of the
Convention. International assistance, provided
on a selective basis, to a maximum of US$5000, may be made
available from the World Heritage Fund for
promotional activities (UNESCO February 1996: 36,
Paragraph 107).
Article 27 of the Convention refers to educational and
information programmes as a means to "strengthen appreciation
and respect by their peoples of the cultural and natural
heritage" (UNESCO 1972).
see International assistance, Young People's
Participation in World Heritage Preservation and Promotion
Property
The World Heritage Convention refers to properties
as being component parts of the cultural and/or
natural heritage. The term property is used
interchangeably with site in the Operational
Guidelines (UNESCO February 1996).
see Sites, Cultural heritage, Natural
heritage
Protection
The World Heritage Convention does not specifically
define protection. Throughout the Convention
reference is made to the "identification, protection,
conservation, presentation and transmission to future
generations of the cultural and natural heritage". Article 5
of the Convention makes reference to a number of
"effective and active measures" that can be taken by States
Parties in ensuring this "identification, protection,
conservation, presentation and transmission" (UNESCO 1972).
Although protection is used very frequently in the
Operational Guidelines it is not defined (UNESCO
February 1996).
Protection is used interchangeably with
conservation, safeguarding and preservation
in the Operational Guidelines.
see Conservation, International protection,
National protection, Preservation,
Safeguarding
R
Reactive monitoring
One of the essential functions of the World Heritage
Committee is to monitor the state of
conservation of properties inscribed in the
World Heritage List. The Operational Guidelines
describe both systematic monitoring and reporting
and reactive monitoring.
75. Reactive monitoring is the reporting by the
World Heritage Centre, other sectors of UNESCO and the
advisory bodies to the Bureau and the Committee on the
state of conservation of specific World Heritage sites that
are under threat. To this end, the States Parties shall
submit to the Committee through the World Heritage Centre,
specific reports and impact studies each time exceptional
circumstances occur or work is undertaken which may have
an effect on the state of conservation of the site.
Reactive monitoring is foreseen in the procedures for the
eventual deletion of properties from the World Heritage
List as set out in paras. 48-56. It is also foreseen in
reference to properties inscribed, or to be inscribed, on
the List of World Heritage in Danger as set out in paras.
82-89 (UNESCO February 1996: 27).
see Monitoring, State of conservation, Systematic
monitoring and reporting
Referral
When examining nominations the Bureau may decide to
recommend to the Committee that a nomination be
referred back to the nominating State for further
information or documentation" (UNESCO February 1996: 24,
Paragraph 65 June/July).
Rehabilitation
The World Heritage Convention does not specifically
define rehabilitation. The Convention makes
reference to the "identification, protection, conservation,
presentation and rehabilitation" of cultural and
natural heritage. Article 5 of the
Convention makes reference to a number of "effective
and active measures" that can be taken by States Parties in
ensuring this "identification, protection, conservation,
presentation and rehabilitation" (UNESCO 1972).
Rehabilitation is not defined in the Operational
Guidelines.
Renomination
Renomination is not referred to specifically in the
Convention or the Operational Guidelines.
Renomination refers to the process where a States
Party submits a new nomination of a property
already inscribed in the World Heritage
List. Renominations may be useful for the purpose
of boundary change or expansion and/or re-evaluation of the
values and the criteria for which the property
had been previously inscribed in the World Heritage
List.
Reporting
see Monitoring, Reactive monitoring, Systematic
monitoring and reporting
Rome Centre
see (ICCROM) International Centre for the Study of the
Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property
Routes
see Heritage route
Rules of Procedure
In complying with Article 10 (1) of the Convention the
World Heritage Committee adopted Rules of Procedure
at its first session and amended them at its second and
third sessions (UNESCO n.d.). The Rules of Procedure
include reference to the conduct of World Heritage Bureau
and Committee meetings.
S
Safeguarding
Safeguarding is used interchangeably with
conservation, preservation and protection
in the Convention and the Operational
Guidelines.
see Conservation, Preservation, Protection
Secretariat
Article 14 of the Convention notes that the World
Heritage Committee "shall be assisted by a Secretariat
appointed by the Director-General" of UNESCO. Since
1992 the World Heritage Centre, located at UNESCO
Headquarters in Paris, France, has performed the role of
the Secretariat to the World Heritage Committee
and its Bureau. The Secretariat is responsible
for the daily administrative and technical management of the
Convention. The World Heritage Centre prepares
the documentation for the Committee and its
Bureau and has the responsibility for the
implementation of their decisions.
Series
A series of cultural or natural properties
situated in different geographical locations may be
proposed for inclusion in the World Heritage List in a
single nomination provided they are related because
they belong to:
(i) the same historico-cultural group or
(ii) the same type of property which is
characteristic of the geographical zone
(iii) the same geomorphological formation, the same
biogeographic province, or the same ecosystem
type
and provided that it is the series as such, and not
its components taken individually, which is of outstanding
universal value (UNESCO February 1996: 6, Paragraph 19).
see Serial property
Serial nomination
see Serial property, series
Serial property
A serial property is a property nominated
and/or inscribed in the World Heritage List as a
series in accordance with Paragraphs 19 and 20 of the
Operational Guidelines (UNESCO February 1996: 5-6).
see Series
Serial site
see Serial property, Series
Sites
Sites are referred to as part of the definition of
cultural heritage in Article 1 of the Convention
(UNESCO 1972). Apart from this specific usage, the term
site is not used in the Convention.
The term site is used interchangeably with property
in the Operational Guidelines (UNESCO February
1996).
see Cultural heritage, Property
Spirit of the Convention
The term spirit of the Convention refers to the
special qualities of the Convention as an
international heritage protection instrument reliant
on collective international protection, the notion of
outstanding universal value, and the conservation
of both natural and cultural heritage in a
single protective instrument.
see Convention
State of conservation
State of conservation reports for natural and
cultural properties included in the World Heritage
List and the List of World Heritage in Danger are
examined by the World Heritage Committee and its
Bureau. State of Conservation reports are
prepared by the advisory bodies IUCN and
ICOMOS, the World Heritage Centre and States
Parties as part of the system of monitoring of
World Heritage properties.
see Monitoring, Reactive monitoring, Systematic
monitoring and reporting
States Parties
States Parties are those Member States of UNESCO
who have ratified, accepted or acceded to the World
Heritage Convention. There were 146 States
Parties to the Convention as of 19 March 1996
(UNESCO 19 March 1996).
Systematic monitoring and reporting
One of the essential functions of the World Heritage
Committee is to monitor the state of
conservation of properties inscribed in the
World Heritage List. The Operational Guidelines
describe systematic monitoring and reporting and
reactive monitoring.
69. Systematic monitoring and
reporting is the continuous process of observing the
conditions of World Heritage sites with periodic
reporting on its state of conservation (UNESCO February
1996: 26, Paragraph 69).
Guidance concerning the objectives, process and importance of
systematic monitoring and reporting is included in
Paragraphs 69 to 74 of the Operational Guidelines
(UNESCO February 1996: 26-27).
see Monitoring, Reactive monitoring, State of
conservation
T
Technical evaluations
see Evaluation, ICOMOS evaluation, IUCN
evaluation
Technical co-operation
Article 22 of the Convention establishes the provision
of assistance for technical co-operation to States
Parties for the conservation of properties
included in the World Heritage List. Technical
co-operation is one of the types of international
assistance available from the World Heritage Fund.
States Parties can request technical co-operation
for a number of specified purposes as outlined in the
Operational Guidelines (UNESCO February 1996: 34-36,
Paragraphs 99-106) using the form entitled
"Request for Technical Co-operation" (UNESCO 1990a). The
form is also available electronically via the INTERNET
at the following address
.
see International assistance
Tentative list
Article 11 of the Convention establishes the
requirement for States Parties to prepare an
inventory of property (UNESCO 1972). The
Operational Guidelines refer to these inventories
as tentative lists.
Paragraphs 7 and 8 of the Operational Guidelines
provide further advice to States Parties as to the
definition of tentative lists.
7. The Committee requests each State Party to
submit to it a tentative list of properties which it
intends to nominate for inscription to the World
Heritage List during the following five to ten years.
This tentative list will constitute the "inventory"
(provided for in Article 11 of the Convention) of the
cultural and natural properties situated within the
territory of each State Party and which it considers
suitable for inclusion in the World Heritage List. The
purpose of these tentative lists is to enable the
Committee to evaluate within the widest possible context
the "outstanding universal value" of each property
nominated to the List. The Committee hopes that States
Parties that have not yet submitted a tentative list
will do so as early as possible. States Parties are
reminded of the Committee's earlier decision not to
consider cultural nominations unless such a list of
cultural properties has been submitted.
8. In order to facilitate the work of all
concerned, the Committee requests States Parties to
submit their tentative lists in a standard format
(see Annex 1) which provides for information under the
following headings:
- the name of the property;
- the geographical location of the property;
- a brief description of the property;
- a justification of the "outstanding
universal value" of the property in accordance
with the criteria and conditions of
authenticity or integrity set out in
paragraphs 24 and 44 below, taking account of
similar properties both inside and outside the
boundaries of the State concerned.
Natural properties should be grouped according to
biogeographical provinces and cultural properties should
be grouped according to cultural periods or areas. The
order in which the properties listed would be
presented for inscription should also be indicated, if
possible (UNESCO February 1996: 3-4).
As stated above the "Model for presenting a tentative list"
is included as Annex 1 of the Operational Guidelines
(UNESCO February 1996).
see Inventory of property
Test of authenticity
see Authenticity
Thematic studies
Thematic and regional studies of cultural and
natural heritage are important contributions of the
Global Strategy. Such studies provide the comparative
basis from which to evaluate the outstanding universal
value of properties nominated for inclusion in the
World Heritage List.
In recent years a number of regional and thematic meetings
have been held on the subject of cultural landscapes
of outstanding universal value (see for example, von
Droste et al 1995, von Droste et al 1995:
Annexes 11 to VI and UNESCO 21 April 1996).
see Global Strategy
Timetable
The procedure and timetable for the processing of
nominations (including deadlines for the receipt,
examination and evaluation of nominations) is
presented in Paragraphs 65 to 67 of the Operational
Guidelines (UNESCO February 1996: 23-25).
Towns
see Groups of urban buildings, Inhabited historic
towns
Training
Articles 22(c) and 23 of the World Heritage Convention
provide for international assistance in the form
of training of staff and specialists in the
conservation of cultural and natural
heritage relating to the implementation of the
World Heritage Convention (UNESCO 1972). Priority is
given to group training at the local or regional
level. States Parties may submit requests for
international assistance with training as
outlined in Paragraphs 94 to 98 of the Operational
Guidelines (UNESCO February 1996: 32-34) using the form
entitled "Requests for the Organization of Training
Activities" (UNESCO 1990b).
In adopting a "Training Strategy" at its nineteenth session
in Berlin, Germany in December 1995 the Committee
stated that:
Training is defined as a broadly encompassing term that
includes education, training and promotion (UNESCO 31
January 1996: 55-56).
see International assistance
Transmission
The World Heritage Convention and the Operational
Guidelines do not specifically define
transmission. Throughout the Convention
reference is made to the "identification, protection,
conservation, presentation and transmission to future
generations of the cultural and natural heritage". Article 5
of the Convention makes reference to a number of
"effective and active measures" that can be taken by States
Parties in ensuring this "identification, protection,
conservation, presentation and transmission" (UNESCO 1972).
U
UNESCO
see United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization
The Constitution of UNESCO (the United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) was signed
in London on 16 November 1945 and came into force with the
twentieth ratification on 4 November 1946. The purposes of
UNESCO as stated in the Constitution are:
... to contribute to peace and security by promoting
collaboration among nations through education, science
and culture in order to further universal respect for
justice, for the rule of law and for the human rights
and fundamental freedoms which are affirmed for the
peoples of the world, without distinction of race, sex,
language or religion, by the Charter of the United
Nations (UNESCO 1945).
The Article 14 of the Convention notes that the
World Heritage Committee "shall be assisted by a
Secretariat appointed by the Director-General" of
UNESCO. Since 1992 the UNESCO World Heritage
Centre has functioned as this Secretariat (UNESCO
1972).
UNESCO World Heritage Centre
see Secretariat
W
WCMC (World Conservation Monitoring Centre)
The WCMC (World Conservation Monitoring
Centre) is an independent charity established by
the IUCN (The World Conservation Union), the
WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature) and UNEP (United Nations
Environment Programme). The WCMC provides an
information service on global conservation. The WCMC
aims to provide reliable up-to-date information on the
conservation of species and ecosystems and to promote the
application of such information for enlightened
conservation planning. The WCMC provides
research, information and technical services so that
decisions affecting the conservation and sustainable use of
biological resources may be based on the best available
information. The WCMC provides information support to
both IUCN and UNESCO to assist them in the
implementation of the World Heritage
Convention.
World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC)
see WCMC
World Conservation Union (IUCN)
see IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of
Nature) - The World Conservation Union
World Heritage
World Heritage may best be defined with reference to the
Preamble to the World Heritage Convention which states
that:
... parts of the cultural or natural heritage are of
outstanding interest and therefore need to be preserved
as part of the world heritage of mankind as a whole
(UNESCO 1972: Preamble).
Paragraph 1 of the Operational Guidelines refers to
the World Heritage (cultural heritage and
natural heritage) as being
... among the priceless and irreplaceable possessions,
not only of each nation, but of mankind as a whole. The
loss, through deterioration or disappearance, of any of
these most prized possessions constitutes an
impoverishment of the heritage of all the peoples in the
world. Parts of that heritage, because of their
exceptional qualities, can be considered to be of
outstanding universal value and as such worthy of
special protection against the dangers which
increasingly threaten them (UNESCO February 1996: 1).
see World Heritage List
World Heritage Bureau
Of the 21 States Parties who are members of the
World Heritage Committee, 7 are also members of the
World Heritage Bureau. The World Heritage Bureau
meets twice a year, once in June/July and a second time
immediately preceding the Committee's regular session,
to prepare the work of the World Heritage Committee
(UNESCO February 1996: 43: Paragraph 132).
see World Heritage Committee
World Heritage Centre
see Secretariat
World Heritage Committee
21 States Parties to the World Heritage Convention
make up the World Heritage Committee in accordance
with Article 8 (1) of the Convention (UNESCO 1972).
The intergovernmental World Heritage Committee meets
once each year.
Paragraph 3 of the Operational Guidelines outlines the
four essential functions of the World Heritage Committee
as being:
(i) to identify, on the basis of nominations submitted
by States Parties, cultural and natural properties
of outstanding universal value which are to be
protected under the Convention and to list those
properties on the "World Heritage List";
(ii) monitor the state of conservation of properties
inscribed on the World Heritage List.
(iii) to decide in case of urgent need which
properties included in the World Heritage List
are to be inscribed on the "List of World
Heritage in Danger" ((only properties which
require for their conservation major
operations and for which assistance has been
requested under the Convention can be
considered));
(iv) to determine in what way and under what conditions
the resources in the World Heritage Fund can most
advantageously be used to assist States Parties, as
far as possible, in the Protection of their
properties of outstanding universal value (UNESCO
February 1996: 1).
World Heritage Convention
see Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural
and natural heritage
World Heritage Education (WHE)
see World Heritage Youth Forum/Fora, Young People's
Participation in World Heritage Preservation and Promotion
World Heritage emblem
The World Heritage emblem was designed by Mr Michel
Olyff and adopted by the Committee at its second
session in 1978. The emblem, reproduced on the front cover
of this Glossary, symbolizes the interdependence of cultural
and natural properties: the central square is a form created
by man and the circle represents nature, the two being
intimately linked. The emblem is round, like the world, but
at the same time it is a symbol of protection.
At its eighteenth session in December 1994 the World
Heritage Committee adopted the addition of text to the
World Heritage emblem. The use of the emblem with
text is explained in Paragraph 122 of the Operational
Guidelines:
The emblem should always carry the text "World Heritage
. Patrimoine Mondial". the space occupied by
"Patrimonio Mundial" can be used for its translation
into the national language of the country where the logo
is to be used (UNESCO February 1996: 41).
Paragraphs 122 to 125 of the Operational Guidelines
include guidance as to the appropriate use of the
World Heritage emblem as adopted by the Committee
(UNESCO February 1996: 41-41, Paragraphs 122-125).
World Heritage Fund
The World Heritage Fund was established according to
Article 15 of the World Heritage Convention (UNESCO
1972). The World Heritage Fund is a trust fund
composed of contributions from a number of sources (including
compulsory and voluntary contributions made by the States
Parties to the Convention) referred to in
Article 15 (3) of the World Heritage Convention. The
Fund provides the financial resources for the
provision of international assistance (Preparatory
assistance, Emergency assistance, Training,
Technical co-operation and assistance for
promotional activities).
see Emergency assistance, International
assistance, Preparatory assistance, Promotional
activities, Technical assistance, Technical co-
operation, Training
World Heritage List
Article 11 (2) of the Convention refers to the
World Heritage List as:
... a list of properties forming part of the cultural
heritage and natural heritage, as defined in Articles 1
and 2 of this, as defined in Articles 1 and 2 of this
Convention, which it considers as having outstanding
universal value in terms of such criteria as it shall
have established. An updated list shall be distributed
at least every two years (UNESCO 1972).
The World Heritage List is intended to be a select
list of cultural and natural heritage properties
of outstanding universal value (UNESCO February
1996: 2, Paragraph 6 (i).
In accordance with Paragraph 135 of the Operational
Guidelines the World Heritage List is published
every year (see UNESCO-ICOMOS Documentation Centre 1996 and
UNESCO 1996).
World Heritage logo
see World Heritage emblem
World Heritage value
see Outstanding universal value
World Heritage Youth Forum/Fora
World Heritage Youth Fora are part of the Young
People's Participation in World Heritage Preservation and
Promotion. Youth fora are convened to bring together
Associated School's Project (ASP) students and teachers to
share their experience of World Heritage Education (WHE), to
catalyse the development of World Heritage curricula and to
facilitate an exchange of information between schools in
different countries. Youth fora were held in Bergen, Norway
in June 1996 and in Dubrovnik, Croatia in May 1996. In
September 1996 a Youth Forum will be held in Zimbabwe.
see Young People's Participation in World Heritage Preservation
and Promotion
World Heritage Youth Project
see World Heritage Youth Forum/Fora, Young People's
Participation in World Heritage Preservation and Promotion
Y
Young People's Participation in World Heritage Preservation and
Promotion
The Young People's Participation in World Heritage
Preservation and Promotion is an inter-regional project
coordinated by the UNESCO World Heritage Centre and
UNESCO's Associated School's Project (coordinated by
UNESCO's Sector for Humanistic, Cultural and
International Education). The project was launched in 1994
in order to sensitize young people at secondary school level
to the importance of World Heritage. The project's
aim is to initiate or reinforce teaching and activities in
the area of World Heritage Education (WHE) and to
produce an education kit to this end.
see World Heritage Youth Forum/Fora
Youth Forum
see World Heritage Youth Forum/Fora, Young People's
Participation in World Heritage Preservation and Promotion
Youth Project
see World Heritage Youth Forum/Fora, Young People's
Participation in World Heritage Preservation and Promotion is
an
Alphabetical Index to List of Terms used in Glossary
A
Action Plan for the Future (Cultural Landscapes)
Advisory bodies
Associative cultural landscape
Authenticity
Authorization form
B
Balance
Biogeographic(al) provinces
Buffer zone
C
Canal
Clearly defined landscape
CNPPA
Comparative assessments
Comparative evaluations
Conservation
Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and
natural heritage
Corrective measures
Criteria
Criterion
Cultural heritage
Cultural heritage criteria
Cultural landscapes
Cultural property
D
Data sheets
Deferred
Deletion
Delisting
E
Emergency assistance
Evaluation
G
Geological and physiographical formations
General Assembly of States Parties to the Convention
Global Strategy
Groups of buildings
Groups of urban buildings
H
Harmonization
Heritage route
I
ICCROM
ICOMOS
ICOMOS evaluation
Identification
Identification number
Immovable property
Implementation
Information sources
Indicative list
Inhabited historic towns
Inscription
Integrity
International assistance
International protection
Inventory of property
IUCN
IUCN evaluation
J
Joint nomination
Justification
L
List of World Heritage in Danger
M
Management
Management plan
Mixed property
Monitoring
Monuments
Movable property
N
National protection
Natural area
Natural features
Natural heritage
Natural heritage criteria
Natural property
Natural sites
Nomination
Nomination form
O
Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World
Heritage Convention
Organically evolved landscape
Organisation of World Heritage Cities (OWHC)
Outstanding universal value
P
Precisely delineated [natural] areas
Preparatory assistance
Presentation
Preservation
Promotional activities
Property
Protection
R
Reactive monitoring
Referral
Rehabilitation
Renomination
Rules of Procedure
S
Safeguarding
Secretariat
Series
Serial property
Sites
Spirit of the Convention
State of conservation
States Parties
Systematic monitoring and reporting
T
Technical co-operation
Tentative list
Thematic studies
Timetable
Training
Transmission
U
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organisation
W
WCMC
World Heritage
World Heritage Bureau
World Heritage Committee
World Heritage emblem
World Heritage Fund
World Heritage List
Y
Young People's Participation in World Heritage Preservation and
Promotion
Bibliography
Larson, K.E. and N. Marstein (Eds) 1994 Conference on
Authenticity in relation to the World Heritage Convention.
Preparatory Workshop, Bergen, Norway, 31 January - 2 February
1994. Workshop Proceedings. Riksantikvaren (Directorate for
Cultural Heritage), Norway. Tapir Forlag, Norway.
Larson, K.E. (Ed) 1995 Nara Conference on Authenticity in
relation to the World Heritage Convention. Nara, Japan 1-6
November 1995. Proceedings. UNESCO World Heritage Centre,
Agency for Cultural Affairs (Japan), ICCROM and ICOMOS. Tapir
Publishers, Trondheim, Norway.
UNESCO n.d. Rules of Procedure. Intergovernmental
Committee for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural
Heritage. UNESCO, Paris, France.
UNESCO 1945 Constitution of the United Nations, Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organization. Adopted in London on 16
November 1945. UNESCO, Paris, France.
UNESCO 1972 Convention concerning the Protection of the World
Cultural and Natural Heritage. Adopted by the General
Conference at its seventeenth session, Paris, 16 November 1972.
UNESCO, Paris, France.
UNESCO 1990a Request for Technical Co-operation.
Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and
natural heritage. SC-90/WS/30. UNESCO, Paris, France.
UNESCO 1990b Requests for the Organization of Training
Activities. Convention concerning the protection of the world
cultural and natural heritage. SC-90/WS/31. UNESCO, Paris,
France.
UNESCO 1990c Request for Preparatory Assistance.
Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and
natural heritage. SC-90/WS/33. UNESCO, Paris, France.
UNESCO 1990d Requests for Emergency Assistance.
Convention concerning the protection of the World cultural and
natural heritage. SC-90/WS/34. UNESCO, Paris, France.
UNESCO 14 December 1992 Report. Convention concerning the
protection of the world cultural and natural heritage. World
Heritage Committee, Sixteenth session (Santa Fe, United States of
America, 7-14 December 1992). WHC-92/CONF.02/12. UNESCO, Paris,
France.
UNESCO 13 October 1994 Expert Meeting on the "Global
Strategy" and thematic studies for a representative World Heritage
List (UNESCO Headquarters, 20-22 June 1994). Convention
concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural
Heritage. World Heritage Committee Eighteenth session, Phuket,
Thailand 12-17 December 1994. WHC-94/CONF.003/INF.6. UNESCO,
Paris, France.
UNESCO 1995 World Heritage List. Nomination Form.
Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and
natural heritage. WHC.95/WS.1. UNESCO, Paris, France.
UNESCO 1996 The World Heritage 1996 [Map]. The UNESCO
World Heritage Centre. UNESCO, Paris, France.
UNESCO 31 January 1996 Report. Convention Concerning the
Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. World
Heritage Committee Nineteenth session, Berlin, Germany 4-9
December 1995. Report. WHC-95/CONF.203/16. UNESCO, Paris,
France.
UNESCO February 1996 Operational Guidelines for the
Implementation of the World Heritage Convention.
Intergovernmental Committee for the Protection of the World
Cultural and Natural Heritage. WHC/2/Revised. UNESCO, Paris,
France.
UNESCO 19 March 1996 List of the 146 States Parties as of 19
March 1996. Convention Concerning the Protection of the World
Cultural and Natural Heritage (Paris, 1972). UNESCO, Paris,
France.
UNESCO 15 April 1996 Information Document: Report of the Expert
Meeting on Evaluation of general principles and criteria for
nominations of natural World Heritage sites (Parc national de
la Vanoise, France, 22 to 24 March 1996). Convention Concerning
the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Bureau
of the World Heritage Committee Twentieth session, UNESCO
Headquarters, Paris, Room X (Fontenoy) 24-29 June 1996. WHC-
96/CONF.202/INF.9. UNESCO, Paris, France.
UNESCO 21 April 1996 Report on the Expert Meeting on European
Cultural Landscapes of Outstanding Universal Value. Vienna,
Austria 21 April 1996. Convention concerning the Protection
of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. World Heritage
Bureau, Twentieth session, Paris, France UNESCO, Paris, France.
UNESCO-ICOMOS Documentation Centre 1996 Biens inscrits sur la
liste du Patrimoine Mondial/Properties included in the World
Heritage List. UNESCO 1972 Convention concernant la
protection du patrimoine mondial, culturel et naturel/Convention
concerning the protection of the World Cultural and Natural
Heritage. WHC-96/WS-1. Centre de documentation UNESCO-ICOMOS
Documentation Centre. Décembre-1995-December. Paris, France.
von Droste, B., Plachter, H. and M. Rössler (Eds) 1995
Cultural Landscapes of Universal Value - Components of a Global
Strategy. Gustav Fischer, Germany.
List of addresses and contacts
United Nations Educational,
Scientific and Cultural
Organization (UNESCO)
7, place de Fontenoy
75352 Paris 07 SP
France
Internet:
http://www.unesco.org/
Telephone: 33 (0)1 45 68 10 00
Facsimile: 33 (0)1 45 67 16 90
UNESCO World Heritage
Centre
UNESCO
7, place de Fontenoy
75352 Paris 07 SP
France
E-mail: wh-info@unesco.org
Internet:
http://www.unesco.org/whc/
Facsimile: 33 (0)1 45 68 55 70
Nordic World Heritage Office
(NWHO)
Postbox 8196 Dep. - N-0034
Oslo
Norway
E-mail: world-heritage.oslo
@rapost.md.dep.telemax.no
Telephone: 47 22 94 05 80
Facsimile: 47 22 94 05 81
ICOMOS
49-51, rue de la Fédération
75015 Paris
France
E-mail: icomos@cicrp.jussieu.fr
http://www.icomos.org/
Telephone: 33 (0)1 42 77 35 76
Facsimile: 33 (0)1 42 77 57 42
IUCN - The World Heritage
Conservation Union
rue Mauverney 28
CH-1196 Gland
Switzerland
E-mail: mail@iucn.org
http://www.iucn.org/
Telephone: 41 22 999 00 01
Facsimile: 41 22 999 00 10
International Centre for the
Study of the Preservation and
Restoration of Cultural
Property (ICCROM)
13 Via di San Michele
1-00153 Roma
Italy
E-mail:iccrom@iccrom.org
http://www.icomos.org/iccrom/
Telephone: 39 6 585 531
Facsimile: 39 6 5855 3349
World Conservation
Monitoring Centre (WCMC)
219c Huntingdon Road
Cambridge CB3 ODL
United Kingdom
E-mail: info@wcmc.org.uk
http://www.wcmc.org.uk/
Telephone: 44 1223 277 314
Facsimile: 44 1223 277 136
Organization of World
Heritage Cities (OWHC)
56 Rue Saint-Pierre
Quebec G1K 4A1
Canada
Telephone: 1 418 692 0000
Facsimile: 1 418 692 5558
E-mail: secretariat@ovpm.org
http://www.ovpm.org/