Limited distribution                                    WHC-94/CONF.003/INF.10
                                                        Paris, 31 October 1994
                                                      original: English/French


                       UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL,
                   CULTURAL AND SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATION

                   CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION
                OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE

                         WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE

                            Eighteenth session

                             Phuket, Thailand

                           12-17 December, 1994

Report on the Expert Meeting on Heritage Canals (Canada, 
September 1994)

*[2]

                    WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION  


                     INFORMATION DOCUMENT ON  
  
                         HERITAGE CANALS  
  
  
             EXPERTS MEETING, 15 - 19 SEPTEMBER 1994  
  
                 CHAFFEYS LOCK, ONTARIO, CANADA  

  
PARTICIPANTS:  Christina Cameron (Canada), Chairperson  
               Mechtild Rossler (World Heritage Centre)  
               Henry Cleere (ICOMOS)  
               Stephen Hughes (TICCIH)  
               Susan Buggey (Canada)  
               Reinhold Castensson (Sweden)  
               A.S. Chawla (India)  
               Michel Cotte (France)  
               Paul Labovitz (U.S.A.)  
               Pan Lu (China)  
               Nora Mitchell (U.S.A.)  
               L. Prematilleke (Sri Lanka)  
               Herb Stovel (Canada)  
               Sitapha Traore (Mali)  
               Henk Weevers (Netherlands)  
  
  
  
RESOURCE PERSONS:  David Ballinger  
                   Gisèle Cantin  
                   Robert Hunter  
                   Dr. Robert Passfield  
                   Judith Sutherland    
  
  
PURPOSE OF MEETING  
  
Canada, following a World Heritage Committee decision in December 
1992, hosted a meeting of experts on heritage canals in September 
1994 to explore the nature and extent of canals, and to examine  
the components of significance.  The results of the deliberations 
are herein presented to the World Heritage Committee for consideration.     

*[3]
  
I DEFINITION   
  
A canal is a human-engineered waterway.  It may be of outstanding 
universal value from the point of view of history or technology,  
either intrinsically or as an exceptional example representative  
of this category of cultural property.  The canal may be a  
monumental work, the defining feature of a linear cultural  
landscape, or an integral component of a complex cultural  
landscape.  
  
  
II VALUES AND AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE  

The significance of canals can be examined under technological,  
economic, social, and landscape factors.  
  
A. TECHNOLOGY  
  
Canals can serve a variety of purposes: irrigation, navigation,  
defence, water-power, flood mitigation, land-drainage and water-supply.  
  
The following are areas of technology which may be of  
significance:  
  
     1. The line and waterproofing of the water channel  
  
     2. The engineering structures of the line with reference to  
        comparative structural features in other areas of  
        architecture and technology  
  
     3. The development of the sophistication of constructional  
        methods  
  
     4. The transfer of technologies.  
  
B. ECONOMY  
  
Canals contribute to the economy in a variety of ways, e.g. in  
terms of economic development and the conveyance of goods and  
people.  Canals were the first man-made routes for the effective  
carriage of bulk cargoes.  Canals played and continue to play a  
key role in economic development through their use for  
irrigation.  The following factors are important:  
  
     1. Nation building  
  
     2. Agricultural development  
  
     3. Industrial development  
  
     4. Generation of wealth  
  
     5. Development of engineering skills applied to other areas  
        and industries  

*[4]
  
     6. Tourism.    
  
  
C.  SOCIAL FACTORS  
  
The building of canals had, and their operation continues to  
have, social consequences:  
  
     1. The redistribution of wealth with social and cultural     
         results  
  
     2. The movement of people and the interaction of cultural    
         groups.  
  
  
D.  LANDSCAPE  
  
Such large-scale engineering works had and continue to have an  
impact on the natural landscape.  Related industrial activity and 
changing settlement patterns cause visible changes to landscape  
forms and patterns.    
  
NOTE:  There are potentially some additional areas of  
significance discussed in other sections of the Operational  
Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage  
Convention that deal with historic towns (paragraph 29) and with  
the natural criteria (in particular paragraph 44 a, points iii  
and possibly iv).  
  
  
III AUTHENTICITY AND INTEGRITY  
  
A. Authenticity depends holistically upon values and the  
relationships between these values.  
  
B. One distinctive feature of the canal as a heritage element is  
its evolution over time.  This is linked to how it was used  
during different periods and the associated technological changes 
the canal underwent.  The extent of these changes may constitute  
a heritage element.  
  
C. The authenticity and historical interpretation of a canal  
encompass the connection between the real property (subject of  
the Convention), possible movable property (boats, temporary  
navigation items) and the associated structures (bridges, etc)  
and landscape.  
  
SEE APPENDIX
  
  
IV MANAGEMENT  
  
A. The concepts of monumental work, corridor and cultural  
landscape are essential management considerations.  
  
B. Management mechanisms for canals require participation by many 

*[5]

partners - public administrations, associations and individuals - 
and a co-ordinating body is therefore essential.  This body must  
be given strong encouragement and the question of its governance  
must be examined at the national or international level.  
  
C. Management of a canal corridor involves renewing its  
components and the cultural landscapes comprising it.  By nature, 
it is dynamic over a span of time (see III.B).  
  
D. Management must develop an information policy aimed at making  
the public and the partners aware of the authenticity and  
historical value of the heritage resource.  Efforts to promote  
the canal must have an educational component aimed at fostering  
an understanding of the canal corridor.  
  
E. Any tourist development must tie in the aspects of  
authenticity with the history of the heritage resource, in a  
dynamic perspective unique to the canal.  In this regard, the  
fragility of the sites must be made apparent and given attention  
by the public, as well as by the management partners.  
  
F. Management bodies should consider the possibility of  
reinvesting a portion of the tourism revenues in maintenance and  
conservation.  
  
  
CHANGES PROPOSED TO OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES  
  
14   Delete sentence 1 since it contradicts sentence 2.  Sentence 
     2 may be understood to supersede sentence 1 and to more  
     accurately reflect the current public circumstances of  
     nomination.  
  
24(a) (i)   reinforce current recommendation of Global Strategy  
            Report for deletion from English version of  
            "represent a unique artistic achievement"   
       
     (ii)   add "or technology" after "landscape design"    
  
     (iii)  no change  
  
     (iv)   add "or technological ..." ie "architectural or   
            technological ensemble"  
  
     (v)    no change  
  
     (vi)   no change  
  
  
Proposed Addition after paragraph 40   
  
A canal is a human-engineered waterway.  It may be of outstanding 
universal value from the point of view of history or technology,  

*[6]

either intrinsically or as an exceptional example representative  
of this category of cultural property.  The canal may be a  
monumental work, the defining feature of a linear cultural  
landscape, or an integral component of a complex cultural  
landscape.    
  
APPENDIX
  
It was felt important to seek methodological means to improve and 
clarify to the degree possible the application of the test of  
authenticity to canals and to their associated landscapes.  In  
this endeavour, it was felt useful to expand the aspects of  
authenticity examined from the four currently noted in the  
Operational Guidelines, to associate these with criteria or  
indicators which could suggest how authenticity of canals might  
best be measured in relation to each of the aspects considered  
and to examine these within a time continuum including project  
planning, execution and ongoing use.  It was felt important to  
stress that the resulting matrix was not meant to be used in a  
directive or mechanistic fashion, but to provide a guiding  
framework for consideration of a range of evidently  
interdependent factors, and ultimately to provide an integrated  
overview of these various factors.    
  
The proposed table is to take the criteria of 24b(i), expand on  
them, and suggest new criteria.  For this purpose, we have  
provided an outline for approaching authenticity.  One of the  
first distinguishing features is their evolution over time:  
design, then construction, then uses.  
  
We have chosen the format of key words and explanatory  
subcriteria.  This outline is not exclusive; it is basically  
indicative and is intended to facilitate an exploration of the  
authenticity.  It is a guide for examining possible questions.   
The result should not be an arithmetic sum of the positive  
responses in a table, but a harmonious whole representing a  
synthesis of elements of authenticity of a canal.  

*[7]
  
  
                                    PLAN         EXECUTION          USE  

1.   Intentions - Objectives  
     - decipherable  
     - documentation  
     - intellectual context  
       
2.Know-how  
     - transmissions  
     - technological context  
       
3.Environment - physical  
     surroundings  
     - validity of canal  
     - environment links  
     - implications of   
       know-how (2)  
     - implications of  
       materials (4)  
  
4.Materials  
     - conservation  
  
5.Design - restoration  
     - periods decipherable  
     - influences  
     - documentation  
  
6.   Uses and functions  
     - continuity of uses  
     - congruence  
     - interruptions in uses  
       and functions