Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

31
Reports
31
Properties concerned
25
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 1994close
Date end:1994close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
States Parties: Cambodia
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Urgent problems of conservation
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Norway
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Risk of uncontrolled property development
States Parties: Spain
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2,WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Need for restoration works
States Parties: Albania
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/10,WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.3
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Malta
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Highly crumbly basic building material
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC.94/CONF.003/07Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Germany
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Need to monitor movements which could affect the structure of the building
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/16
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Need to improve the environment of the convent; Notorious state of degradation
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Need for an inventory of the park's natural and cultural resources
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/16
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Precarious state of conservation of the stone
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/16
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B,WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2,WHC-94/CONF.003/6
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2,WHC.94/CONF.003/16
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures
States Parties: Malta
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Worrying state of conservation of some temples; Fragility of the structures (cracks, etc.)
States Parties: Greece
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.1
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: chemical pollution
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Croatia
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: China
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Unstable archaeological strata and cave roof

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top