State of Conservation
12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
1988close
Date end:1988close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
bahla fortBahla Fort | oman Oman | 1988 |
Other Threats: Degradation of the structures |
No |
djoudj national bird sanctuaryDjoudj National Bird Sanctuary | senegal Senegal | 1988 | Management systems/ management plan, Water (rain/water table), Water infrastructure, | Yes |
goreme national park and the rock sites of cappadociaGöreme National Park and the Rock Sites of Cappadocia | turkiye Türkiye | 1988 | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, | No |
historic district of old quebecHistoric District of Old Québec | canada Canada | 1988 | Housing, | No |
manu national parkManú National Park | peru Peru | 1988 | Oil and gas, | No |
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area | united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania | 1988 | Financial resources, Management systems/ management plan, | Yes |
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park | senegal Senegal | 1988 | Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, | No |
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras Honduras | 1988 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
studenica monasteryStudenica Monastery | serbia Serbia | 1988 | Water infrastructure, | No |
tai national parkTaï National Park | cote d'ivoire Côte d'Ivoire | 1988 | Crop production, Illegal activities, Mining, | No |
wieliczka and bochnia royal salt minesWieliczka and Bochnia Royal Salt Mines | poland Poland | 1988 | Relative humidity,
Water (rain/water table),
Other Threats: Gradual degradation |
No |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america United States of America | 1988 |
Other Threats: Fire |
No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.