jump to the content

State of Conservation (SOC)

Results

45 SOC reports
25 Property(ies)
19 States Parties
Date end: 1986

By Year
Properties by Region
Properties by Category
 1  2  3   See All
  • Aldabra Atoll (1986)
    Seychelles
    Year: 1986
    Threats*: Air transport infrastructure, Management systems/ management plan, Financial resources,
    Document Source: CC.86/CONF.003/INF.4,CC.86/CONF.001/11

  • Djoudj National Bird Sanctuary (1986)
    Senegal
    Year: 1986
    Threats*: Water infrastructure, Water,
    Danger List: Yes
    Document Source: CC.86/CONF.003/INF.4,CC.86/CONF.001/11

  • Djoudj National Bird Sanctuary (1985)
    Senegal
    Year: 1985
    Threats*: Water infrastructure, Water,
    Danger List: Yes
    Document Source: SC.85/CONF.008/09

  • Djoudj National Bird Sanctuary (1984)
    Senegal
    Year: 1984
    Threats*: Water infrastructure, Water,
    Document Source: SC.84/CONF.001/04,SC.84/CONF.004/04

  • Djoudj National Bird Sanctuary (1983)
    Senegal
    Year: 1983
    Threats*: Water infrastructure, Water,
    Document Source: SC.83/CONF.009/8

  • Djoudj National Bird Sanctuary (1982)
    Senegal
    Year: 1982
    Threats*: Water infrastructure, Water,
    Document Source: CLT.82/CONF.015/08

  • Durmitor National Park (1985)
    Montenegro
    Year: 1985
    Threats*: Water infrastructure,
    Document Source: SC.85/CONF.008/09

  • Durmitor National Park (1984)
    Montenegro
    Year: 1984
    Threats*: Water infrastructure, Surface water pollution,
    Document Source: SC.84/CONF.004/09

  • Galápagos Islands (1986)
    Ecuador
    Year: 1986
    Threats*: Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: CC.86/CONF.003/INF.4,CC.86/CONF.001/11

  • Galápagos Islands (1985)
    Ecuador
    Year: 1985
    Threats*:
    Other Threats: Fire
    Document Source: SC.85/CONF.008/09

  • Garamba National Park (1986)
    Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Year: 1986
    Threats*: Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan,
    Danger List: Yes
    Document Source: CC.86/CONF.003/INF.4,CC.86/CONF.001/11

  • Garamba National Park (1985)
    Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Year: 1985
    Threats*: Illegal activities,
    Danger List: Yes
    Document Source: SC.85/CONF.008/09

  • Garamba National Park (1984)
    Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Year: 1984
    Threats*: Illegal activities,
    Document Source: SC.84/CONF.001/04,SC.84/CONF.004/04

  • Great Barrier Reef (1986)
    Australia
    Year: 1986
    Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, Ground transport infrastructure, Mining,
    Document Source: CC.86/CONF.003/INF.4,CC.86/CONF.001/11

  • Great Barrier Reef (1985)
    Australia
    Year: 1985
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure,
    Document Source: SC.85/CONF.008/09

  • Ichkeul National Park (1986)
    Tunisia
    Year: 1986
    Threats*: Water infrastructure, Air pollution, Livestock farming/grazing of domesticated animals, Subsistence hunting, Water,
    Document Source: CC.86/CONF.003/INF.4,CC.86/CONF.001/11

  • Ichkeul National Park (1985)
    Tunisia
    Year: 1985
    Threats*: Water infrastructure, Air pollution, Livestock farming/grazing of domesticated animals, Subsistence hunting, Water,
    Document Source: SC.85/CONF.008/09

  • Iguazu National Park (1986)
    Argentina
    Year: 1986
    Threats*: Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: CC.86/CONF.003/INF.4,CC.86/CONF.001/11

  • Kakadu National Park (1986)
    Australia
    Year: 1986
    Threats*: Mining, Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: CC.86/CONF.003/INF.4,CC.86/CONF.001/11

  • Los Glaciares National Park (1986)
    Argentina
    Year: 1986
    Threats*: Housing, Water infrastructure, Land conversion, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
    Document Source: CC.86/CONF.003/INF.4,CC.86/CONF.001/11

 1  2  3   See All


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.