English Français
Help preserve sites now!

State of Conservation (SOC)

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
15
Reports
11
Properties
9
States Parties
Senegal
Year: 1984
Document Source: SC.84/CONF.001/04,SC.84/CONF.004/04
Threats*:Water (rain/water table) Water infrastructure
Senegal
Year: 1983
Document Source: SC.83/CONF.009/8
Threats*:Water (rain/water table) Water infrastructure
Senegal
Year: 1982
Document Source: CLT.82/CONF.015/08
Threats*:Water (rain/water table) Water infrastructure
Montenegro
Year: 1984
Document Source: SC.84/CONF.004/09
Threats*:Surface water pollution Water infrastructure
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 1984
Document Source: SC.84/CONF.001/04,SC.84/CONF.004/04
Threats*:Illegal activities
Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea
Year: 1984
Document Source: SC.84/CONF.004/09
Threats*:Financial resources Illegal activities Management systems/ management plan
Montenegro
Year: 1979
Document Source: CC-79/CONF.015/04
Threats*:Earthquake
United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 1984
Document Source: SC.84/CONF.001/04,SC.84/CONF.004/04
Threats*:Management systems/ management plan
United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 1983
Document Source: SC.83/CONF.009/8
Threats*:Management systems/ management plan
Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 1982
Other Threats: Loss of historical authenticity
Document Source: CLT.82/CONF.014/03,CLT.82/CONF.014/06
Threats*:Deliberate destruction of heritage Housing Legal framework Management systems/ management plan
Ethiopia
Year: 1984
Document Source: SC.84/CONF.004/09
Threats*:War
Côte d'Ivoire
Year: 1984
Document Source: SC.84/CONF.004/09
Threats*:Crop production Illegal activities Mining
Australia
Year: 1984
Document Source: SC.84/CONF.004/07,SC.84/CONF.004/09
Threats*:Water infrastructure
Australia
Year: 1983
Document Source: SC.83/CONF.009/INF.5
Threats*:Water infrastructure
Poland
Year: 1984
Other Threats: Gradual deterioration
Document Source: SC.84/CONF.004/04
Threats*:Relative humidity Water (rain/water table)
Properties
Categories
Regions


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.