English Français
Help preserve sites now!

State of Conservation (SOC)

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
11
Reports
11
Properties
11
States Parties
Mauritania
Year: 2005
Other Threats: a) Absence of any real ecotourism policy and strategy; b) Poor progress recorded in the improvement of the living conditions of the local populations
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*:Human resources
Pakistan
Year: 2005
Danger List: Yes
Other Threats: a) Lack of capacity in conservation techniques; b) Lack of monitoring system
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*:Human resources
Egypt
Year: 2005
Other Threats: Dilapidated infrastructure; Neglect and lack of maintenance
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*:Human resources
Kenya
Year: 2005
Other Threats: a) Fire; b) Lack of law enforcement
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*:Human resources
India
Year: 2005
Danger List: Yes
Other Threats: Destruction to park infrastructure
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*:Human resources
Australia
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*:Human resources
Philippines
Year: 2005
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*:Human resources
Honduras
Year: 2005
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*:Human resources
South Africa
Year: 2005
Other Threats: a) Difficulties with operational aspects of maintenance and conservation implementation ; b) Lack of appropriate conservation of the built heritage; c) Lack of integration of natural values in management of site
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*:Human resources
Bangladesh
Year: 2005
Other Threats: Lack of monitoring system
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*:Human resources
Uganda
Year: 2005
Other Threats: a) Anti-personnel mines infestation in the park; b) Degradation of lands around the park
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*:Human resources
Properties
Categories
Regions


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.