Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 1993close
Date end:1993close
Threats* : Financial resourcesclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) peru Peru 1993 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
 No
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 1993 Financial resources, No
historic centre of saint petersburg and related groups of monumentsHistoric Centre of Saint Petersburg and Related Groups of Monuments russian federation Russian Federation 1993 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Steady deterioration of the city's pysical environment; Large-scale rehabilitation project for the Hermitage
 No
kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley nepal Nepal 1993 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
 No
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost russian federation Russian Federation 1993 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures
 No
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea		 1993 Financial resources, Yes
national history park – citadel, sans souci, ramiersNational History Park – Citadel, Sans Souci, Ramiers haiti Haiti 1993 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Consolidation of the Sans Souci Palace and rehabilitation of the Royal Gardens required
 No
virunga national parkVirunga National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 1993 Financial resources, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top