Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

209
Reports
49
Properties concerned
31
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2007close
Threats* : Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and communityclose
States Parties: Niger
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Poverty
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Niger
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Poverty
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add.2
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add,WHC-06/30.COM/7B.ADD2
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/14
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Continuous deterioration of earthen architecture structures and decorated surfaces from lack of conservation and maintenace practices
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/18
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/13
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3A,WHC-98/CONF.203/7
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Danger List:  Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top