English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
8
Reports
8
Properties
5
States Parties
States Parties:  Mauritania
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: a) Absence of any real ecotourism policy and strategy; b) Poor progress recorded in the improvement of the living conditions of the local populations
States Parties:  Peru
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance of historic buildings; b) Use of reinforced concrete in the centre of town
States Parties:  Romania
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
States Parties:  Peru
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
States Parties:  Brazil
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
States Parties:  Peru
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
States Parties:  Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: a) Natural risk factors; b) Conservation of archaeological heritage; c) Deterioration of monuments; d) Alteration of the built fabric.
States Parties:  United States of America
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.