English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
10
Reports
10
Properties
8
States Parties
States Parties:  Mauritania
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
States Parties:  Peru
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: Deliberate neglect of historic properties
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
States Parties:  Peru
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
States Parties:  China
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
States Parties:  Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year:  2004
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance; b) Natural factors
States Parties:  South Africa
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: a) Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities; b) Fire
States Parties:  New Zealand
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: Oil spill in the harbour
States Parties:  Lao People's Democratic Republic
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
States Parties:  United States of America
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B.Add
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: Brucella infection threat to bison population


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.