Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

28
Reports
11
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2013close
Threats* : Air transport infrastructureclose
Aldabra Atoll (1986)
States Parties: Seychelles
Year: 1986
Document Source: CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Ancient City of Sigiriya (2001)
States Parties: Sri Lanka
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Kathmandu Valley (2013)
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Laurisilva of Madeira (2009)
States Parties: Portugal
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Lines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa (2011)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
Mammoth Cave National Park (2002)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Maya Site of Copan (2013)
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena
Maya Site of Copan (2012)
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena
Maya Site of Copan (2011)
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Other Threats: b) Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena;
Maya Site of Copan (2009)
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena
Maya Site of Copan (2008)
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena
Maya Site of Copan (2007)
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Maya Site of Copan (2006)
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Maya Site of Copan (2005)
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Maya Site of Copan (2004)
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Maya Site of Copan (2003)
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Pythagoreion and Heraion of Samos (1994)
States Parties: Greece
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/10
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Sagarmatha National Park (2009)
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Sagarmatha National Park (2007)
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Sagarmatha National Park (2006)
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Greece Honduras Lao People's Democratic Republic Nepal Peru Portugal Seychelles Sri Lanka United States of America
Threats
Air transport infrastructure 28

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top